GeForce RTX 5090 vs GT 230M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1214not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.68no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGT216GB202
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 June 2009 (15 years ago)2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4821760
Core clock speed500 MHz2017 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2407 MHz
Number of transistors486 million92,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt575 Watt
Texture fill rate8.0001,637
Floating-point processing power0.1056 TFLOPS104.8 TFLOPS
Gigaflops158no data
ROPs8192
TMUs16680
Tensor Coresno data680
Ray Tracing Coresno data170

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR7
Maximum RAM amountUp to 1 GB32 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 600 (DDR2), Up to 800 (GDDR3), Up to 1066 (GDDR3) MHz2209 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 (DDR2), 25 (DDR3)1.79 TB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVIVGADisplayPortHDMISingle Link DVI1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIHDAno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.8
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA+10.1

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 40 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 575 Watt

GT 230M has 2400% lower power consumption.

RTX 5090, on the other hand, has a 900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 230M and GeForce RTX 5090. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 230M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 5090 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M
GeForce GT 230M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
GeForce RTX 5090

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 26 votes

Rate GeForce GT 230M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 704 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.