UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) vs GeForce 9800M GTX SLI
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 9800M GTX SLI and UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
9800M GTX SLI outperforms UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 757 | 842 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | 1.48 | no data |
Architecture | G9x (2007−2010) | Gen. 12 (2021−2023) |
GPU code name | NB9E-GTX | Alder Lake Xe |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 15 July 2008 (16 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 224 | 24 |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 450 MHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 750 MHz |
Number of transistors | 3016 Million | no data |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | large | no data |
SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR3 | no data |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | no data |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | no data |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | no data |
Shared memory | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Quick Sync | no data | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 10 | 12_1 |
CUDA | + | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 10−12
+25%
| 8
−25%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
+50%
|
4−5
−50%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 9−10
+12.5%
|
8−9
−12.5%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Battlefield 5 | 5−6
+66.7%
|
3−4
−66.7%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6−7
−16.7%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
+50%
|
4−5
−50%
|
Far Cry 5 | 6−7
+50%
|
4−5
−50%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 8−9
+33.3%
|
6−7
−33.3%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18
+54.5%
|
10−12
−54.5%
|
Hitman 3 | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 21−24
+21.1%
|
18−20
−21.1%
|
Metro Exodus | 4−5
+300%
|
1−2
−300%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 8−9
+60%
|
5−6
−60%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 12−14
+18.2%
|
10−12
−18.2%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 35−40
+5.4%
|
35−40
−5.4%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 9−10
+12.5%
|
8−9
−12.5%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Battlefield 5 | 5−6
+66.7%
|
3−4
−66.7%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6−7
−16.7%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
+50%
|
4−5
−50%
|
Far Cry 5 | 6−7
+50%
|
4−5
−50%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 8−9
+33.3%
|
6−7
−33.3%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18
+54.5%
|
10−12
−54.5%
|
Hitman 3 | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 21−24
+21.1%
|
18−20
−21.1%
|
Metro Exodus | 4−5
+300%
|
1−2
−300%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 8−9
+60%
|
5−6
−60%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 12−14
+30%
|
10
−30%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
+7.7%
|
12−14
−7.7%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 35−40
+5.4%
|
35−40
−5.4%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 9−10
+12.5%
|
8−9
−12.5%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6−7
−16.7%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
+50%
|
4−5
−50%
|
Far Cry 5 | 6−7
+50%
|
4−5
−50%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18
+54.5%
|
10−12
−54.5%
|
Hitman 3 | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 21−24
+21.1%
|
18−20
−21.1%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 12−14
+8.3%
|
12
−8.3%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
+250%
|
4
−250%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 35−40
+5.4%
|
35−40
−5.4%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 8−9
+60%
|
5−6
−60%
|
1440p
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6
+66.7%
|
3−4
−66.7%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
+33.3%
|
6−7
−33.3%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 18−20
+46.2%
|
12−14
−46.2%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7
+20%
|
5−6
−20%
|
4K
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Far Cry New Dawn | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
This is how 9800M GTX SLI and UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) compete in popular games:
- 9800M GTX SLI is 25% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the 9800M GTX SLI is 300% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- 9800M GTX SLI is ahead in 46 tests (90%)
- there's a draw in 5 tests (10%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 3.07 | 2.32 |
Recency | 15 July 2008 | 3 January 2023 |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 10 nm |
9800M GTX SLI has a 32.3% higher aggregate performance score.
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 550% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce 9800M GTX SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.