UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) vs GeForce 9800M GTX SLI
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 9800M GTX SLI and UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) outperforms 9800M GTX SLI by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 776 | 732 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | 1.41 | no data |
Architecture | G9x (2007−2010) | no data |
GPU code name | NB9E-GTX | no data |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 15 July 2008 (16 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 224 | 32 |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Number of transistors | 3016 Million | no data |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | large | no data |
SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR3 | no data |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | no data |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | no data |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | no data |
Shared memory | - | no data |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 10 | 12_1 |
CUDA | + | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 12−14
−16.7%
| 14
+16.7%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 10−12
+57.1%
|
7
−57.1%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
−14.3%
|
8−9
+14.3%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Battlefield 5 | 8−9
−25%
|
10−11
+25%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 10−12
+83.3%
|
6
−83.3%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
−14.3%
|
8−9
+14.3%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
+7.1%
|
14
−7.1%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 3−4
−66.7%
|
5−6
+66.7%
|
Metro Exodus | 6−7
−83.3%
|
11
+83.3%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 10−12
−9.1%
|
12−14
+9.1%
|
Valorant | 4−5
−75%
|
7−8
+75%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 8−9
−25%
|
10−11
+25%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 10−12
−9.1%
|
12−14
+9.1%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
−14.3%
|
8−9
+14.3%
|
Dota 2 | 9−10
+28.6%
|
7
−28.6%
|
Far Cry 5 | 18−20
+12.5%
|
16
−12.5%
|
Fortnite | 16−18
−17.6%
|
20−22
+17.6%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
+15.4%
|
13
−15.4%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 3−4
−66.7%
|
5−6
+66.7%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 9−10
+28.6%
|
7
−28.6%
|
Metro Exodus | 6−7
+20%
|
5
−20%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 27−30
−14.3%
|
30−35
+14.3%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 10−12
−9.1%
|
12−14
+9.1%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−12
−18.2%
|
12−14
+18.2%
|
Valorant | 4−5
−75%
|
7−8
+75%
|
World of Tanks | 55−60
−12.7%
|
60−65
+12.7%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 8−9
−25%
|
10−11
+25%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 10−12
−9.1%
|
12−14
+9.1%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
−14.3%
|
8−9
+14.3%
|
Dota 2 | 9−10
−11.1%
|
10−11
+11.1%
|
Far Cry 5 | 18−20
−5.6%
|
18−20
+5.6%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
+0%
|
15
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 3−4
−66.7%
|
5−6
+66.7%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 27−30
−14.3%
|
30−35
+14.3%
|
Valorant | 4−5
−75%
|
7−8
+75%
|
1440p
High Preset
Dota 2 | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
−14.3%
|
24−27
+14.3%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
World of Tanks | 21−24
−19%
|
24−27
+19%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 7−8
−14.3%
|
8−9
+14.3%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Valorant | 10−11
−10%
|
10−12
+10%
|
4K
High Preset
Dota 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16−18
+6.7%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−11.1%
|
10−11
+11.1%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 16−18
−12.5%
|
18−20
+12.5%
|
Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
Fortnite | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Valorant | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
This is how 9800M GTX SLI and UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) compete in popular games:
- UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) is 17% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the 9800M GTX SLI is 83% faster.
- in Dota 2, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) is 100% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- 9800M GTX SLI is ahead in 8 tests (16%)
- UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) is ahead in 33 tests (65%)
- there's a draw in 10 tests (20%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 2.96 | 3.42 |
UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) has a 15.5% higher aggregate performance score.
The UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.