HD Graphics 5500 vs GeForce 8800M GTX

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8800M GTX with HD Graphics 5500, including specs and performance data.

8800M GTX
2007
512 MB GDDR3, 65 Watt
1.20

HD Graphics 5500 outperforms 8800M GTX by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1048970
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.286.97
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code nameG92Broadwell GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 November 2007 (17 years ago)5 September 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96192
Core clock speed500 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data850 MHz
Number of transistors754 million1,300 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate24.0020.40
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPS0.3264 TFLOPS
ROPs163
TMUs4824

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-HERing Bus
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A+
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

8800M GTX 1.20
HD Graphics 5500 1.51
+25.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8800M GTX 462
HD Graphics 5500 581
+25.8%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

8800M GTX 3422
HD Graphics 5500 4798
+40.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p10−12
−30%
13
+30%
Full HD7−8
−42.9%
10
+42.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Hitman 3 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−200%
6
+200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−6.3%
30−35
+6.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Hitman 3 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−18.2%
13
+18.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−6.3%
30−35
+6.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Hitman 3 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+450%
2
−450%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−6.3%
30−35
+6.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Hitman 3 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 1−2
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 1−2

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

This is how 8800M GTX and HD Graphics 5500 compete in popular games:

  • HD Graphics 5500 is 30% faster in 900p
  • HD Graphics 5500 is 43% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the 8800M GTX is 450% faster.
  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the HD Graphics 5500 is 300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • 8800M GTX is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • HD Graphics 5500 is ahead in 30 tests (64%)
  • there's a draw in 16 tests (34%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.20 1.51
Recency 1 November 2007 5 September 2014
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

HD Graphics 5500 has a 25.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

The HD Graphics 5500 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800M GTX in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 8800M GTX is a notebook card while HD Graphics 5500 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
GeForce 8800M GTX
Intel HD Graphics 5500
HD Graphics 5500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 2 votes

Rate GeForce 8800M GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1555 votes

Rate HD Graphics 5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.