GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile vs 8800M GTS
Aggregate performance score
RTX 3070 Ti Mobile outperforms 8800M GTS by a whopping 4132% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 1070 | 82 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.07 | no data |
Architecture | G9x (2007−2010) | Ampere (2020−2022) |
GPU code name | NB8E-GT | GN20-E6 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 19 November 2007 (16 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
Current price | $110 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 64 | 5888 |
CUDA cores | 64 | no data |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 915 MHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 1480 MHz |
Number of transistors | 754 million | 17,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 8 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 125 Watt (80 - 125 Watt TGP) |
Texture fill rate | 16.00 | 248.2 |
Floating-point performance | 160 gflops | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on GeForce 8800M GTS and GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | large | large |
Interface | MXM-HE | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 8 GB |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.6 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 3.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
CUDA | 1.1 | 8.6 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
RTX 3070 Ti Mobile outperforms 8800M GTS by 4132% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
RTX 3070 Ti Mobile outperforms 8800M GTS by 3109% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 2−3
−5600%
| 114
+5600%
|
1440p | 1−2
−6900%
| 70
+6900%
|
4K | 1−2
−4700%
| 48
+4700%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−4200%
|
129
+4200%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−3000%
|
90−95
+3000%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−3600%
|
111
+3600%
|
Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−1560%
|
80−85
+1560%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−3025%
|
120−130
+3025%
|
Hitman 3 | 3−4
−5533%
|
169
+5533%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 12−14
−1233%
|
160−170
+1233%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2
−9800%
|
95−100
+9800%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 9−10
−2722%
|
254
+2722%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−3000%
|
90−95
+3000%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−2867%
|
89
+2867%
|
Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−1900%
|
100
+1900%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−3025%
|
120−130
+3025%
|
Hitman 3 | 3−4
−1800%
|
57
+1800%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 12−14
−1233%
|
160−170
+1233%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2
−9800%
|
95−100
+9800%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 9−10
−1711%
|
163
+1711%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−6167%
|
188
+6167%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−3000%
|
90−95
+3000%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−2600%
|
81
+2600%
|
Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−1560%
|
80−85
+1560%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−3025%
|
120−130
+3025%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 12−14
−1233%
|
160−170
+1233%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−3333%
|
103
+3333%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2
−9800%
|
95−100
+9800%
|
1440p
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−8000%
|
80−85
+8000%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 0−1 | 95−100 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5
−1525%
|
65−70
+1525%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−4900%
|
50
+4900%
|
Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−9900%
|
100
+9900%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | 85−90 |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 4−5
−2200%
|
90−95
+2200%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−6100%
|
60−65
+6100%
|
4K
High Preset
Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−1740%
|
92
+1740%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2
−5300%
|
50−55
+5300%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 36 |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2
−5300%
|
50−55
+5300%
|
Metro Exodus | 4−5
−1000%
|
40−45
+1000%
|
4K
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
−1800%
|
35−40
+1800%
|
This is how 8800M GTS and RTX 3070 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:
- RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is 5600% faster in 1080p
- RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is 6900% faster in 1440p
- RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is 4700% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Far Cry 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is 9900% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, RTX 3070 Ti Mobile surpassed 8800M GTS in all 36 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.99 | 41.90 |
Recency | 19 November 2007 | 4 January 2022 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 8 GB |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 8 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 125 Watt |
The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800M GTS in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.