GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile vs 8800M GTS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

8800M GTS
2007
512 MB GDDR3, 50 Watt
0.99

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile outperforms 8800M GTS by a whopping 4132% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking107082
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.07no data
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameNB8E-GTGN20-E6
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date19 November 2007 (16 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price$110 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores645888
CUDA cores64no data
Core clock speed500 MHz915 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1480 MHz
Number of transistors754 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt125 Watt (80 - 125 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate16.00248.2
Floating-point performance160 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce 8800M GTS and GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfaceMXM-HEPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.18.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

8800M GTS 0.99
RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 41.90
+4132%

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile outperforms 8800M GTS by 4132% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

8800M GTS 2552
RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 81895
+3109%

RTX 3070 Ti Mobile outperforms 8800M GTS by 3109% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−3
−5600%
114
+5600%
1440p1−2
−6900%
70
+6900%
4K1−2
−4700%
48
+4700%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4200%
129
+4200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−3000%
90−95
+3000%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3600%
111
+3600%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1560%
80−85
+1560%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−3025%
120−130
+3025%
Hitman 3 3−4
−5533%
169
+5533%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−1233%
160−170
+1233%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−9800%
95−100
+9800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−2722%
254
+2722%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−3000%
90−95
+3000%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2867%
89
+2867%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1900%
100
+1900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−3025%
120−130
+3025%
Hitman 3 3−4
−1800%
57
+1800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−1233%
160−170
+1233%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−9800%
95−100
+9800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−1711%
163
+1711%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−6167%
188
+6167%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−3000%
90−95
+3000%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2600%
81
+2600%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1560%
80−85
+1560%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−3025%
120−130
+3025%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−1233%
160−170
+1233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−3333%
103
+3333%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−9800%
95−100
+9800%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−8000%
80−85
+8000%
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 95−100

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4900%
50
+4900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−9900%
100
+9900%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 85−90
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−2200%
90−95
+2200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−6100%
60−65
+6100%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 5−6
−1740%
92
+1740%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−5300%
50−55
+5300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 36
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−5300%
50−55
+5300%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−1000%
40−45
+1000%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1800%
35−40
+1800%

This is how 8800M GTS and RTX 3070 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is 5600% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is 6900% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is 4700% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is 9900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 3070 Ti Mobile surpassed 8800M GTS in all 36 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.99 41.90
Recency 19 November 2007 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 125 Watt

The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800M GTS in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS
GeForce 8800M GTS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 17 votes

Rate GeForce 8800M GTS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 779 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.