RTX 3070 Mobile vs 8800M GTS

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

8800M GTS
0.99

RTX 3070 Mobile outperforms 8800M GTS by 3644% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1066119
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.07no data
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameNB8E-GTGN20-E5 GA104
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date19 November 2007 (16 years old)4 January 2021 (3 years old)
Current price$110 no data
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores645120
CUDA cores64no data
Core clock speed500 MHz780 - 1100 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1290 - 1620 MHz
Number of transistors754 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt125 Watt
Texture fill rate16.00287.0
Floating-point performance160 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce 8800M GTS and GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfaceMXM-HEPCIe 4.0 x16

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s320.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA1.18.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

8800M GTS 0.99
RTX 3070 Mobile 37.07
+3644%

RTX 3070 Mobile outperforms 8800M GTS by 3644% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

8800M GTS 382
RTX 3070 Mobile 14364
+3660%

RTX 3070 Mobile outperforms 8800M GTS by 3660% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

8800M GTS 2552
RTX 3070 Mobile 77148
+2923%

RTX 3070 Mobile outperforms 8800M GTS by 2923% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3−4
−3800%
117
+3800%
1440p2−3
−3750%
77
+3750%
4K1−2
−4800%
49
+4800%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3867%
119
+3867%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−1022%
100−110
+1022%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3467%
107
+3467%
Hitman 3 0−1 148
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 93
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−3500%
108
+3500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−1900%
140
+1900%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−1022%
100−110
+1022%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2833%
88
+2833%
Hitman 3 0−1 138
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 84
Metro Exodus 1−2
−9600%
97
+9600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2100%
66
+2100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−1629%
121
+1629%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−5567%
170
+5567%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2367%
74
+2367%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−3033%
94
+3033%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1933%
60−65
+1933%
Hitman 3 3−4
−3167%
98
+3167%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−688%
63
+688%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−1680%
89
+1680%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4600%
47
+4600%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−4450%
91
+4450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−5100%
50−55
+5100%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−3200%
30−35
+3200%
Hitman 3 1−2
−3600%
35−40
+3600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−113%
17
+113%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 24−27
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 33
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1600%
51
+1600%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−1060%
58
+1060%

This is how 8800M GTS and RTX 3070 Mobile compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • RTX 3070 Mobile is 3800% faster than 8800M GTS

1440p resolution:

  • RTX 3070 Mobile is 3750% faster than 8800M GTS

4K resolution:

  • RTX 3070 Mobile is 4800% faster than 8800M GTS

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3070 Mobile is 9600% faster than the 8800M GTS.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 3070 Mobile surpassed 8800M GTS in all 25 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 0.99 37.07
Recency 19 November 2007 4 January 2021
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 125 Watt

The GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800M GTS in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS
GeForce 8800M GTS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 17 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1579 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.