Quadro P3000 Mobile vs FirePro W9100
Aggregated performance score
FirePro W9100 outperforms Quadro P3000 Mobile by 7% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary Details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 246 | 271 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation | 3.02 | 9.84 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
| GPU code name | Hawaii | N17E-Q1 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 26 March 2014 (10 years ago) | 11 January 2017 (7 years ago) |
| Current price | $1566 | $537 |
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
P3000 Mobile has 226% better value for money than FirePro W9100.
Detailed Specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2816 | 1280 |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 1088 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1215 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 6,200 million | 7,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 750 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 163.7 | 97.20 |
| Floating-point performance | 5,238 gflops | 3,110 gflops |
Form Factor & Compatibility
Information on FirePro W9100 and Quadro P3000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | no data | large |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Length | 275 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Form factor | full height / full length | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | no data |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 7008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 168 GB/s |
| Shared memory | no data | - |
Connectivity and Outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
| Display Port | no data | 1.4 |
| StereoOutput3D | 1 | no data |
| Dual-link DVI support | 1 | no data |
| HD сomponent video output | 1 | no data |
Supported Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | no data | + |
| 3D Stereo | no data | + |
| Mosaic | no data | + |
| nView Display Management | no data | + |
| Optimus | no data | + |
API Compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | no data | 6.1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 65−70
+1.6%
| 64
−1.6%
|
| 4K | 30−35
+7.1%
| 28
−7.1%
|
Pros & Cons Summary
| Performance score | 20.63 | 19.21 |
| Recency | 26 March 2014 | 11 January 2017 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 6 GB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 750 Watt | 75 Watt |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between FirePro W9100 and Quadro P3000 Mobile.
Be aware that FirePro W9100 is a workstation card while Quadro P3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with Similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
