FirePro W9100 vs Quadro P5200
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro P5200 with FirePro W9100, including specs and performance data.
P5200 outperforms W9100 by an impressive 52% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 227 | 321 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 21.43 | 5.13 |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) |
| GPU code name | GP104 | Hawaii |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 21 February 2018 (7 years ago) | 26 March 2014 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2560 | 2816 |
| Core clock speed | 1556 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1746 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 7,200 million | 6,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 750 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 279.4 | 163.7 |
| Floating-point processing power | 8.94 TFLOPS | 5.238 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160 | 176 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB | 704 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 1024 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Bus support | no data | PCIe 3.0 |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 275 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Form factor | no data | full height / full length |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 230.4 GB/s | 320 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
| StereoOutput3D | - | + |
| Dual-link DVI support | - | + |
| HD сomponent video output | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | - |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 120
+60%
| 75−80
−60%
|
| 4K | 48
+60%
| 30−35
−60%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 160−170
+62%
|
100−105
−62%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 60−65
+60%
|
40−45
−60%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 60−65
+52.5%
|
40−45
−52.5%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 100−110
+54.3%
|
70−75
−54.3%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 160−170
+62%
|
100−105
−62%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 60−65
+60%
|
40−45
−60%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 90−95
+55%
|
60−65
−55%
|
| Fortnite | 130−140
+57.6%
|
85−90
−57.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 110−120
+60%
|
70−75
−60%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 90−95
+63.6%
|
55−60
−63.6%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 60−65
+52.5%
|
40−45
−52.5%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 110−120
+52%
|
75−80
−52%
|
| Valorant | 180−190
+54.2%
|
120−130
−54.2%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 100−110
+54.3%
|
70−75
−54.3%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 160−170
+62%
|
100−105
−62%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 270−280
+59.4%
|
170−180
−59.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 60−65
+60%
|
40−45
−60%
|
| Dota 2 | 130−140
+55.3%
|
85−90
−55.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 90−95
+55%
|
60−65
−55%
|
| Fortnite | 130−140
+57.6%
|
85−90
−57.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 110−120
+60%
|
70−75
−60%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 90−95
+63.6%
|
55−60
−63.6%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 100−110
+55.4%
|
65−70
−55.4%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 60−65
+52.5%
|
40−45
−52.5%
|
| Metro Exodus | 65−70
+62.5%
|
40−45
−62.5%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 110−120
+52%
|
75−80
−52%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 118
+57.3%
|
75−80
−57.3%
|
| Valorant | 180−190
+54.2%
|
120−130
−54.2%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 100−110
+54.3%
|
70−75
−54.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 60−65
+60%
|
40−45
−60%
|
| Dota 2 | 130−140
+55.3%
|
85−90
−55.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 90−95
+55%
|
60−65
−55%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 110−120
+60%
|
70−75
−60%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 60−65
+52.5%
|
40−45
−52.5%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 110−120
+52%
|
75−80
−52%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 65
+62.5%
|
40−45
−62.5%
|
| Valorant | 180−190
+54.2%
|
120−130
−54.2%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 130−140
+57.6%
|
85−90
−57.6%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 65−70
+62.5%
|
40−45
−62.5%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 200−210
+53.8%
|
130−140
−53.8%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 50−55
+54.3%
|
35−40
−54.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 35−40
+62.5%
|
24−27
−62.5%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+59.1%
|
110−120
−59.1%
|
| Valorant | 220−230
+58.6%
|
140−150
−58.6%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 75−80
+56%
|
50−55
−56%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−33
+66.7%
|
18−20
−66.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 65−70
+67.5%
|
40−45
−67.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
+52%
|
50−55
−52%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 30−35
+52.4%
|
21−24
−52.4%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 45−50
+63.3%
|
30−33
−63.3%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 70−75
+57.8%
|
45−50
−57.8%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−33
+66.7%
|
18−20
−66.7%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 55−60
+60%
|
35−40
−60%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 18−20
+80%
|
10−11
−80%
|
| Metro Exodus | 24−27
+56.3%
|
16−18
−56.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 46
+53.3%
|
30−33
−53.3%
|
| Valorant | 170−180
+55.5%
|
110−120
−55.5%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 45−50
+66.7%
|
27−30
−66.7%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−33
+66.7%
|
18−20
−66.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+62.5%
|
8−9
−62.5%
|
| Dota 2 | 90−95
+63.6%
|
55−60
−63.6%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 35−40
+66.7%
|
21−24
−66.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+70%
|
30−33
−70%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 18−20
+80%
|
10−11
−80%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+57.1%
|
21−24
−57.1%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 30−35
+57.1%
|
21−24
−57.1%
|
This is how Quadro P5200 and FirePro W9100 compete in popular games:
- Quadro P5200 is 60% faster in 1080p
- Quadro P5200 is 60% faster in 4K
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 26.62 | 17.52 |
| Recency | 21 February 2018 | 26 March 2014 |
| Chip lithography | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 750 Watt |
Quadro P5200 has a 51.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 650% lower power consumption.
The Quadro P5200 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W9100 in performance tests.
Be aware that Quadro P5200 is a mobile workstation graphics card while FirePro W9100 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
