Quadro NVS 320M vs FirePro W5130M

Place in performance ranking	679	1184
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.13	no data
Architecture	GCN (2011−2017)	G8x (2007−2008)
GPU code name	Tropo	G84M
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	2 October 2015 (8 years ago)	9 June 2007 (17 years ago)
Current price	$1041	$66

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	32
Core clock speed	no data	575 MHz
Boost clock speed	925 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,500 million	289 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	20 Watt
Texture fill rate	29.60	9.200
Floating-point performance	947.2 gflops	73.6 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on FirePro W5130M and Quadro NVS 320M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-HE

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3, GDDR2
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	700 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	22.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Eyefinity	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	5.1	4.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	no data	1.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

W5130M 3.65
+576%

NVS 320M 0.54

FirePro W5130M outperforms Quadro NVS 320M by 576% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

W5130M 1409
+577%

NVS 320M 208

FirePro W5130M outperforms Quadro NVS 320M by 577% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

20
+900%

2−3

−900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

18−20

+500%

3−4
−500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Battlefield 5	50−55 +525%	8−9 −525%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +500%	3−4 −500%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +500%	3−4 −500%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +543%	7−8 −543%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Forza Horizon 4	100−105 +525%	16−18 −525%
Hitman 3	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 +567%	12−14 −567%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +500%	3−4 −500%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +567%	9−10 −567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +543%	7−8 −543%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +567%	9−10 −567%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Battlefield 5	50−55 +525%	8−9 −525%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +500%	3−4 −500%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +500%	3−4 −500%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +543%	7−8 −543%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Forza Horizon 4	100−105 +525%	16−18 −525%
Hitman 3	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 +567%	12−14 −567%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +500%	3−4 −500%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +567%	9−10 −567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +543%	7−8 −543%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +500%	3−4 −500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +567%	9−10 −567%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +500%	3−4 −500%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +500%	3−4 −500%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +543%	7−8 −543%
Forza Horizon 4	100−105 +525%	16−18 −525%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 +567%	12−14 −567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +543%	7−8 −543%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +500%	3−4 −500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +567%	9−10 −567%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

60−65

+567%

9−10
−567%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +567%	6−7 −567%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 +500%	5−6 −500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 +500%	3−4 −500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +575%	4−5 −575%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +567%	6−7 −567%
Hitman 3	40−45 +567%	6−7 −567%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 +500%	3−4 −500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +500%	3−4 −500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

+500%

3−4
−500%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	0−1	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	0−1	0−1
Metro Exodus	18−20 +500%	3−4 −500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%