AMD FirePro W5130M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
Comparison of FirePro W5130M and Quadro K2100M architecture, market type and release date.
FirePro W5130M and Quadro K2100M's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of FirePro W5130M and Quadro K2100M's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
29.6 GTexel / s
32.02 GTexel / s
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on FirePro W5130M and Quadro K2100M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
PCIe 3.0 x16
Parameters of memory installed on FirePro W5130M and Quadro K2100M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
64 GB / s
48.0 GB / s
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on FirePro W5130M and Quadro K2100M.
Technological solutions and APIs supported by FirePro W5130M and Quadro K2100M. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
3D Vision Pro
nView Display Management
APIs supported by FirePro W5130M and Quadro K2100M, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of FirePro W5130M and Quadro K2100M. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
K2100M 6.94 +11.6%
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
W5130M 14381 +21.5%
3DMark Fire Strike Score
W5130M 1997 +28.6%
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
W5130M 2110 +31.4%
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
W5130M 3106 +29.7%
Rendering quality tests
GFXBench high precision render quality
Cryptocurrency mining performance of FirePro W5130M and Quadro K2100M. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
Let's see how good FirePro W5130M and Quadro K2100M are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of AMD FirePro W5130M
Much newer (2 October 2015 vs 23 July 2013)
Higher memory bandwidth (64 vs 48 GB/s)
OpenGL 4.3 (Open Graphics Library - an API for 3D graphics and GPUs usage)
Mantle (an API developed by AMD for 3D graphics acceleration. Discontinued and later superceded by Vulkan)
Eyefinity (allows using several displays with an AMD GPU)
Enduro (saves battery charge by automatically switching between an integrated and discrete AMD GPU depending on workload. Similar to NVIDIA Optimus)
AMD App Acceleration
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
11.6% faster in synthetic tests
More pipelines (576 vs 512)
Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)
PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)
CUDA (Compute Unified Device Architecture - an API for video card computing power usage in tasks different from 3D graphics processing. Can be used for physics simulation for instance)
So, FirePro W5130M or Quadro K2100M?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA Quadro K2100M.
Should you still have questions on choice between FirePro W5130M and Quadro K2100M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.