ATI Radeon IGP 340M vs GeForce Go 7900 GS

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12601556
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.54no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameG71RS200
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date18 April 2006 (18 years ago)5 October 2002 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores272
Core clock speed375 MHz183 MHz
Boost clock speed375 MHz180 MHz
Number of transistors278 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Wattno data
Texture fill rate7.5000.37
ROPs162
TMUs202

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-IIAGP 4x
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)7.0
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.11.4
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 7900 GS 176
+8700%
ATI IGP 340M 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Valorant 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 0−1 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Far Cry 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 no data

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 2−3 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Go 7900 GS is 200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Go 7900 GS is ahead in 18 tests (75%)
  • there's a draw in 6 tests (25%)

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2006 5 October 2002
Chip lithography 90 nm 180 nm

Go 7900 GS has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 7900 GS and Radeon IGP 340M. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GS
GeForce Go 7900 GS
ATI Radeon IGP 340M
Radeon IGP 340M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate GeForce Go 7900 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 340M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 7900 GS or Radeon IGP 340M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.