Quadro NVS 320M vs FirePro M8900

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1224
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.85
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameBlackcombG84
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date12 April 2011 (13 years ago)9 June 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96032
Core clock speed680 MHz575 MHz
Number of transistors1,700 million289 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate32.649.200
Floating-point processing power1.306 TFLOPS0.0736 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs4816

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-HE
Form factorMXM-Bno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth115 GB/s22.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 April 2011 9 June 2007
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 20 Watt

FirePro M8900 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 320M, on the other hand, has 275% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M8900 and Quadro NVS 320M. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M8900
FirePro M8900
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
Quadro NVS 320M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 9 votes

Rate FirePro M8900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.