RTX A2000 vs FirePro W4190M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro W4190M with RTX A2000, including specs and performance data.

W4190M
2015
2 GB GDDR5
2.98

RTX A2000 outperforms W4190M by a whopping 1094% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking771137
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data86.03
Power efficiencyno data36.67
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameOpalGA106
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date12 November 2015 (8 years ago)10 August 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3843328
Core clock speed825 MHz562 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors950 million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data70 Watt
Texture fill rate21.60124.8
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPS7.987 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs24104
Tensor Coresno data104
Ray Tracing Coresno data26

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

W4190M 2.98
RTX A2000 35.58
+1094%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

W4190M 1150
RTX A2000 13728
+1094%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

W4190M 2351
RTX A2000 19978
+750%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

W4190M 1745
RTX A2000 14934
+756%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

W4190M 12317
RTX A2000 94407
+666%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

W4190M 5166
RTX A2000 73380
+1320%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD11
−773%
96
+773%
1440p3−4
−1433%
46
+1433%
4K2−3
−1350%
29
+1350%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−1011%
100−105
+1011%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−1088%
95−100
+1088%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−1088%
190−200
+1088%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1088%
95−100
+1088%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−1082%
260−270
+1082%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1067%
140−150
+1067%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−1054%
450−500
+1054%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−1011%
100−105
+1011%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−1088%
95−100
+1088%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−1088%
190−200
+1088%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1088%
95−100
+1088%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−1082%
260−270
+1082%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1067%
140−150
+1067%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−1043%
160−170
+1043%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−1054%
450−500
+1054%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−1011%
100−105
+1011%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−1088%
190−200
+1088%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1088%
95−100
+1088%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−1082%
260−270
+1082%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1067%
140−150
+1067%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
−1067%
70−75
+1067%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−1054%
450−500
+1054%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−1000%
55−60
+1000%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1088%
95−100
+1088%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1088%
95−100
+1088%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−1067%
210−220
+1067%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%

This is how W4190M and RTX A2000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A2000 is 773% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A2000 is 1433% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A2000 is 1350% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.98 35.58
Recency 12 November 2015 10 August 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm

RTX A2000 has a 1094% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W4190M in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W4190M is a mobile workstation card while RTX A2000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W4190M
FirePro W4190M
NVIDIA RTX A2000
RTX A2000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 27 votes

Rate FirePro W4190M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 558 votes

Rate RTX A2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.