Quadro T1200 Mobile vs FirePro W2100

Place in the ranking	840	284
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	6.23	74.64
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Oland	TU117
Market segment	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	12 August 2014 (10 years ago)	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	320	1024
Core clock speed	630 MHz	855 MHz
Boost clock speed	680 MHz	1425 MHz
Number of transistors	950 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	26 Watt	18 Watt
Texture fill rate	13.60	91.20
Floating-point processing power	0.4352 TFLOPS	2.918 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	32
TMUs	20	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Width	1-slot	no data
Form factor	low profile / half length	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DisplayPort	No outputs
DisplayPort count	2	no data
Dual-link DVI support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro W2100 2.34

T1200 Mobile 19.40
+729%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

FirePro W2100 1085

T1200 Mobile 10134
+834%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

FirePro W2100 7771

T1200 Mobile 50827
+554%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	14 −314%	58 +314%
1440p	3−4 −1000%	33 +1000%
4K	9−10 −800%	81 +800%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6

−540%

30−35
+540%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −450%	40−45 +450%
Battlefield 5	3−4 −2067%	65−70 +2067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −567%	40−45 +567%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −540%	30−35 +540%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −1525%	65 +1525%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −783%	50−55 +783%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −1018%	120−130 +1018%
Hitman 3	7−8 −457%	35−40 +457%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −216%	60 +216%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −960%	50−55 +960%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −436%	59 +436%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −45.9%	54 +45.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −450%	40−45 +450%
Battlefield 5	3−4 −2067%	65−70 +2067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −567%	40−45 +567%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −540%	30−35 +540%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −1375%	59 +1375%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −783%	50−55 +783%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −1018%	120−130 +1018%
Hitman 3	7−8 −457%	35−40 +457%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −147%	47 +147%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −6800%	65−70 +6800%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −960%	50−55 +960%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −300%	44 +300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −446%	71 +446%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −27%	47 +27%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −450%	40−45 +450%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −650%	45−50 +650%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −540%	30−35 +540%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −1300%	56 +1300%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −1018%	120−130 +1018%
Hitman 3	7−8 −686%	55−60 +686%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −689%	150−160 +689%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −718%	90−95 +718%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −185%	37 +185%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +94.7%	19 −94.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6
−700%

40−45

+700%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −650%	30−33 +650%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −700%	24−27 +700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −900%	20−22 +900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −1267%	41 +1267%
Hitman 3	7−8 −686%	55−60 +686%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 −650%	45−50 +650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 +8.3%	12 −8.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6
−700%

40−45

+700%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −500%	12−14 +500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −1000%	10−12 +1000%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	8−9

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4
−700%

24−27

+700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21 +0%	21 +0%
Battlefield 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Hitman 3	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	32 +0%	32 +0%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18 +0%	18 +0%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Hitman 3	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

This is how FirePro W2100 and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

T1200 Mobile is 314% faster in 1080p
T1200 Mobile is 1000% faster in 1440p
T1200 Mobile is 800% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the FirePro W2100 is 95% faster.
in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the T1200 Mobile is 6800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

FirePro W2100 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
T1200 Mobile is ahead in 38 tests (57%)
there's a draw in 27 tests (40%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.34	19.40
Recency	12 August 2014	12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	26 Watt	18 Watt

T1200 Mobile has a 729.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 44.4% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W2100 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W2100 is a workstation card while Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.