GeForce GT 640 OEM vs Quadro M620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M620 with GeForce GT 640 OEM, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M620
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
7.24
+326%

M620 outperforms GT 640 OEM by a whopping 326% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking538935
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency17.712.50
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGM107GK107
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date11 January 2017 (7 years ago)24 April 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512384
Core clock speed756 MHz797 MHz
Boost clock speed977 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate31.2625.50
Floating-point processing power1 TFLOPS0.6121 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs3232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz891 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s28.51 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA5.03.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD25
+400%
5−6
−400%
4K10
+400%
2−3
−400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+380%
10−11
−380%
Hitman 3 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+330%
10−11
−330%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+350%
12−14
−350%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+380%
10−11
−380%
Hitman 3 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+330%
10−11
−330%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
+343%
14−16
−343%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+350%
12−14
−350%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+380%
10−11
−380%
Hitman 3 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+330%
10−11
−330%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
+400%
2−3
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+350%
12−14
−350%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+333%
6−7
−333%
Hitman 3 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+360%
10−11
−360%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Hitman 3 3−4 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%

This is how Quadro M620 and GT 640 OEM compete in popular games:

  • Quadro M620 is 400% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro M620 is 400% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.24 1.70
Recency 11 January 2017 24 April 2012
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 50 Watt

Quadro M620 has a 325.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The Quadro M620 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 640 OEM in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M620 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GT 640 OEM is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M620
Quadro M620
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM
GeForce GT 640 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 173 votes

Rate Quadro M620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 35 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.