GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs FirePro W2100

Place in the ranking	848	296
Place by popularity	not in top-100	20
Power efficiency	6.17	28.46
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Oland	GA107
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	12 August 2014 (10 years ago)	17 December 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	320	2048
Core clock speed	630 MHz	1185 MHz
Boost clock speed	680 MHz	1477 MHz
Number of transistors	950 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	26 Watt	45 Watt
Texture fill rate	13.60	94.53
Floating-point processing power	0.4352 TFLOPS	6.05 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	32
TMUs	20	64
Tensor Cores	no data	256
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x8
Width	1-slot	no data
Form factor	low profile / half length	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	112.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+
G-SYNC support	-	+
DisplayPort count	2	no data
Dual-link DVI support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	+	-
VR Ready	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	-	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro W2100 2.34

RTX 2050 Mobile 18.68
+698%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

FirePro W2100 1085

RTX 2050 Mobile 8965
+726%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

FirePro W2100 7771

RTX 2050 Mobile 58257
+650%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	12 −250%	42 +250%
1440p	4−5 −750%	34 +750%
4K	2 −1150%	25 +1150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6

−880%

49
+880%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −425%	40−45 +425%
Battlefield 5	3−4 −1933%	60−65 +1933%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −533%	35−40 +533%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −740%	42 +740%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −1000%	40−45 +1000%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −733%	50−55 +733%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −964%	110−120 +964%
Hitman 3	7−8 −529%	44 +529%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −379%	90−95 +379%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −6300%	60−65 +6300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −900%	50−55 +900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −455%	60−65 +455%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −138%	85−90 +138%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −425%	40−45 +425%
Battlefield 5	3−4 −1933%	60−65 +1933%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −533%	35−40 +533%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −500%	30 +500%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −1000%	40−45 +1000%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −733%	50−55 +733%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −964%	110−120 +964%
Hitman 3	7−8 −514%	43 +514%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −379%	90−95 +379%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −6300%	60−65 +6300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −900%	50−55 +900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −464%	62 +464%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −223%	40−45 +223%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −138%	85−90 +138%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −425%	40−45 +425%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −533%	35−40 +533%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −400%	25 +400%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −1000%	40−45 +1000%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −964%	110−120 +964%
Hitman 3	7−8 −457%	39 +457%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −379%	90−95 +379%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −400%	55 +400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −154%	33 +154%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +106%	18 −106%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6

−900%

50−55
+900%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −800%	35−40 +800%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −833%	27−30 +833%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −850%	18−20 +850%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −2000%	21−24 +2000%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1000%	10−12 +1000%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −633%	21−24 +633%
Hitman 3	7−8 −214%	21−24 +214%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 −533%	35−40 +533%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −2000%	21−24 +2000%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 −754%	110−120 +754%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6

−520%

30−35
+520%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	18−20
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −450%	10−12 +450%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	8−9

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−433%

16−18
+433%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	47 +0%	47 +0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Metro Exodus	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%

This is how FirePro W2100 and RTX 2050 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 2050 Mobile is 250% faster in 1080p
RTX 2050 Mobile is 750% faster in 1440p
RTX 2050 Mobile is 1150% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the FirePro W2100 is 106% faster.
in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 2050 Mobile is 6300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

FirePro W2100 is ahead in 1 test (1%)
RTX 2050 Mobile is ahead in 55 tests (79%)
there's a draw in 14 tests (20%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.34	18.68
Recency	12 August 2014	17 December 2021
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	26 Watt	45 Watt

FirePro W2100 has 73.1% lower power consumption.

RTX 2050 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 698.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W2100 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W2100 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.