GeForce 610M vs FirePro W2100

Place in performance ranking	810	1118
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.42	0.13
Architecture	GCN (2011−2017)	Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code name	Mars	N13M-GE
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	2 October 2015 (8 years ago)	6 December 2011 (12 years ago)
Current price	$123	$55

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FirePro W2100 has 223% better value for money than GeForce 610M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	320	48
CUDA cores	no data	48
Core clock speed	680 MHz	672 MHz
Boost clock speed	680 MHz	900 MHz
Number of transistors	950 million	292 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	26 Watt	12 Watt
Texture fill rate	13.60	Up to 7.2 billion/sec
Floating-point performance	435.2 gflops	129.02 gflops
Video decoders	no data	H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p

Form factor & compatibility

Information on FirePro W2100 and GeForce 610M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus support	PCIe 3.0	PCI Express 2.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Width	1-slot	no data
Form factor	low profile / half length	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	Up to 14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	no data	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	Up to 2048x1536
DisplayPort count	2	no data
Dual-link DVI support	1	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	+	no data
Optimus	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 API
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	no data	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro W2100 2.34
+212%

GeForce 610M 0.75

FirePro W2100 outperforms GeForce 610M by 212% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FirePro W2100 903
+210%

GeForce 610M 291

FirePro W2100 outperforms GeForce 610M by 210% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

FirePro W2100 3706
+171%

GeForce 610M 1368

FirePro W2100 outperforms GeForce 610M by 171% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	10 +233%	3−4 −233%
4K	2	0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

9−10
+200%

3−4

−200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Battlefield 5	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +200%	9−10 −200%
Hitman 3	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +192%	12−14 −192%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 +200%	10−11 −200%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Battlefield 5	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +200%	9−10 −200%
Hitman 3	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +192%	12−14 −192%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 +200%	10−11 −200%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +200%	9−10 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +192%	12−14 −192%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 +200%	10−11 −200%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Far Cry 5	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Hitman 3	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10
+200%

3−4

−200%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	0−1	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7
+200%

2−3

−200%

This is how FirePro W2100 and GeForce 610M compete in popular games:

FirePro W2100 is 233% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.34	0.75
Recency	2 October 2015	6 December 2011
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	26 Watt	12 Watt