Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs FirePro V5900

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

FirePro V5900
2011
2 GB GDDR5
3.26

Iris Plus Graphics 645 outperforms FirePro V5900 by 22% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking703654
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.15no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake (2019)
GPU code nameCaymanKaby Lake GT3e
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date24 May 2011 (12 years ago)10 July 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price$89 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51248
Core clock speed600 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1150 MHz
Number of transistors2,640 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate19.2050.40
Floating-point performance614.4 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on FirePro V5900 and Iris Plus Graphics 645 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1
Length230 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3, DDR4
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth64 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVINo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.1
VulkanN/A1.1.103

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro V5900 3.26
Iris Plus Graphics 645 3.98
+22.1%

Iris Plus Graphics 645 outperforms FirePro V5900 by 22% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FirePro V5900 1263
Iris Plus Graphics 645 1727
+36.7%

Iris Plus Graphics 645 outperforms FirePro V5900 by 37% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
−23.8%
26
+23.8%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.26 3.98
Recency 24 May 2011 10 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB System Shared
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 15 Watt

The Iris Plus Graphics 645 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro V5900 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro V5900 is a workstation card while Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro V5900
FirePro V5900
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Iris Plus Graphics 645

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 47 votes

Rate FirePro V5900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 104 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 645 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.