GeForce GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 vs FirePro V5900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking812not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.02no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameCaymanGT200B
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date24 May 2011 (14 years ago)27 November 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512216
Core clock speed600 MHz576 MHz
Number of transistors2,640 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt171 Watt
Texture fill rate19.2041.47
Floating-point processing power0.6144 TFLOPS0.5365 TFLOPS
ROPs3228
TMUs3272
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KB224 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length230 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB896 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit448 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz999 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s111.9 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 May 2011 27 November 2008
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 896 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 171 Watt

FirePro V5900 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 128.6% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 128% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V5900 and GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V5900 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro V5900
FirePro V5900
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 54 votes

Rate FirePro V5900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V5900 or GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.