HD Graphics 630 vs FirePro V5900

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

FirePro V5900
2011
2 GB GDDR5
3.26
+5.5%

FirePro V5900 outperforms HD Graphics 630 by 6% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking703718
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.150.09
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake (2015−2017)
GPU code nameCaymanKaby-Lake-H-GT2
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date24 May 2011 (12 years ago)1 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Current price$89 $370

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FirePro V5900 has 1178% better value for money than HD Graphics 630.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51224
Core clock speed600 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1150 MHz
Number of transistors2,640 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate19.2026.40
Floating-point performance614.4 gflops441.6 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1
Length230 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4
Maximum RAM amount2 GB64 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth64 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVINo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.1
VulkanN/A+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro V5900 3.26
+5.5%
HD Graphics 630 3.09

FirePro V5900 outperforms HD Graphics 630 by 6% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FirePro V5900 1263
+5.5%
HD Graphics 630 1197

FirePro V5900 outperforms HD Graphics 630 by 6% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14−16
−7.1%
15
+7.1%
1440p65−70
+1.6%
64
−1.6%
4K12−14
−8.3%
13
+8.3%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.26 3.09
Recency 24 May 2011 1 January 2017
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 64 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 15 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between FirePro V5900 and HD Graphics 630.

Be aware that FirePro V5900 is a workstation graphics card while HD Graphics 630 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro V5900
FirePro V5900
Intel HD Graphics 630
HD Graphics 630

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 47 votes

Rate FirePro V5900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1084 votes

Rate HD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.