GRID K120Q vs FirePro M7740

Place in performance ranking	828	1112
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.15	no data
Architecture	Terascale 1 (2008−2010)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	RV740	GK107
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	4 August 2009 (14 years ago)	2 July 2014 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$125
Current price	$255	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	192
Core clock speed	650 MHz	850 MHz
Number of transistors	826 million	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	130 Watt
Texture fill rate	20.80	13.60
Floating-point performance	832.0 gflops	326.4 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on FirePro M7740 and GRID K120Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Width	no data	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	1782 MHz
Memory bandwidth	54.14 GB/s	28.51 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	4.1	5.1
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA	no data	3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6
+400%

1−2

−400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3	0−1
Battlefield 5	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Far Cry 5	2−3	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Hitman 3	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3	0−1
Battlefield 5	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Far Cry 5	2−3	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Hitman 3	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Metro Exodus	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3	0−1
Battlefield 5	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Far Cry 5	2−3	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Hitman 3	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Metro Exodus	0−1	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3	0−1

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3	0−1
Hitman 3	2−3	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.07	0.76
Recency	4 August 2009	2 July 2014
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	512 MB
Chip lithography	40 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	130 Watt