Radeon 740M vs FirePro M6100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro M6100 with Radeon 740M, including specs and performance data.

FirePro M6100
2013
2 GB GDDR5
5.50

Radeon 740M outperforms FirePro M6100 by an impressive 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking572453
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.77no data
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)RDNA 3
GPU code nameBonairePhoenix
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date1 October 2013 (10 years ago)23 May 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price$120 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768256
Core clock speed1100 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2500 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data30 Watt (30 - 15 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate51.6040.00
Floating-point performance1,651 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on FirePro M6100 and Radeon 740M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed6000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth88 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro M6100 5.50
Radeon 740M 8.96
+62.9%

Radeon 740M outperforms FirePro M6100 by 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FirePro M6100 2122
Radeon 740M 3461
+63.1%

Radeon 740M outperforms FirePro M6100 by 63% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60
−58.3%
95−100
+58.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6 no data
Battlefield 5 14−16 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data
Far Cry 5 12−14 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16 no data
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 no data
Hitman 3 10−11 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30 no data
Metro Exodus 12−14 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6 no data
Battlefield 5 14−16 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data
Far Cry 5 12−14 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16 no data
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 no data
Hitman 3 10−11 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30 no data
Metro Exodus 12−14 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data
Far Cry 5 12−14 no data
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Far Cry 5 8−9 no data
Forza Horizon 4 9−10 no data
Hitman 3 10−11 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14 no data
Metro Exodus 4−5 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5 no data
Hitman 3 2−3 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Far Cry 5 3−4 no data
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7 no data
Metro Exodus 7−8 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7 no data

This is how FirePro M6100 and Radeon 740M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 740M is 58% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.50 8.96
Recency 1 October 2013 23 May 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm

The Radeon 740M is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M6100 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro M6100 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon 740M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M6100
FirePro M6100
AMD Radeon 740M
Radeon 740M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 139 votes

Rate FirePro M6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 34 votes

Rate Radeon 740M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.