Quadro P2200 vs FirePro M6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro M6000 with Quadro P2200, including specs and performance data.

FirePro M6000
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 43 Watt
4.72

P2200 outperforms M6000 by a whopping 414% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking654238
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.5322.19
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameHeathrowGP106
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date1 July 2012 (12 years ago)10 June 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6401280
Core clock speed800 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1493 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)43 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate32.00119.4
Floating-point processing power1.024 TFLOPS3.822 TFLOPS
ROPs1640
TMUs4080

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data201 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Form factorMXM-Bno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount2 GB5 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1251 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s200.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort
StereoOutput3D+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FirePro M6000 4.72
Quadro P2200 24.27
+414%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro M6000 1820
Quadro P2200 9351
+414%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p58
−400%
290−300
+400%
Full HD42
−400%
210−220
+400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−400%
90−95
+400%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−400%
60−65
+400%
Fortnite 24−27
−400%
130−140
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−376%
100−105
+376%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−400%
90−95
+400%
Valorant 55−60
−409%
290−300
+409%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−400%
90−95
+400%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
−413%
400−450
+413%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Dota 2 35−40
−413%
200−210
+413%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−400%
60−65
+400%
Fortnite 24−27
−400%
130−140
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−376%
100−105
+376%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−400%
75−80
+400%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−400%
90−95
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−400%
60−65
+400%
Valorant 55−60
−409%
290−300
+409%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−400%
90−95
+400%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Dota 2 35−40
−413%
200−210
+413%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−400%
60−65
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−376%
100−105
+376%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−400%
90−95
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−400%
60−65
+400%
Valorant 55−60
−409%
290−300
+409%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
−400%
130−140
+400%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
−400%
170−180
+400%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−400%
160−170
+400%
Valorant 45−50
−400%
240−250
+400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−400%
80−85
+400%
Valorant 21−24
−400%
110−120
+400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Dota 2 14−16
−400%
75−80
+400%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%

This is how FirePro M6000 and Quadro P2200 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P2200 is 400% faster in 900p
  • Quadro P2200 is 400% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.72 24.27
Recency 1 July 2012 10 June 2019
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 5 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 43 Watt 75 Watt

FirePro M6000 has 74.4% lower power consumption.

Quadro P2200, on the other hand, has a 414.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P2200 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M6000 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro M6000 is a mobile workstation card while Quadro P2200 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M6000
FirePro M6000
NVIDIA Quadro P2200
Quadro P2200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 15 votes

Rate FirePro M6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 385 votes

Rate Quadro P2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M6000 or Quadro P2200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.