UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs vs FirePro D700

Place in performance ranking	350	629
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	5.42	no data
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)	Gen. 12 (2021)
GPU code name	Tahiti	Tiger Lake Xe
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	18 January 2014 (10 years ago)	30 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price	$413	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	32
Core clock speed	850 MHz	350 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1450 MHz
Number of transistors	4,313 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	274 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	108.8	no data
Floating-point performance	3,482 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on FirePro D700 and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data
Length	279 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	no data
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	no data
Memory bus width	384 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	5480 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	263.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	no data	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	DirectX 12_1
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

50−55
+213%

−213%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +200%	9−10 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 +173%	11 −173%
Battlefield 5	55−60 +206%	18 −206%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 +200%	10−11 −200%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +186%	14 −186%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +192%	12−14 −192%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +200%	20−22 −200%
Hitman 3	50−55 +213%	16 −213%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 +213%	24−27 −213%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +208%	13 −208%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 +213%	16−18 −213%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +200%	20−22 −200%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +200%	9−10 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 +200%	9 −200%
Battlefield 5	50−55 +213%	16 −213%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 +200%	10−11 −200%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +208%	13 −208%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +192%	12−14 −192%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +200%	20−22 −200%
Hitman 3	35−40 +192%	12 −192%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 +213%	24−27 −213%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +200%	6 −200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +200%	4 −200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 +213%	16−18 −213%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 +200%	10−11 −200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +200%	20−22 −200%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +200%	9−10 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Battlefield 5	45−50 +200%	15 −200%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +192%	12 −192%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +192%	12−14 −192%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +200%	20−22 −200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 +200%	10−11 −200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +200%	20−22 −200%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +200%	6−7 −200%
Hitman 3	27−30 +200%	9−10 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 +200%	10−11 −200%
Metro Exodus	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +200%	8−9 −200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Battlefield 5	24−27 +200%	8−9 −200%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +200%	6−7 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Hitman 3	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +200%	6−7 −200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +180%	5−6 −180%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Battlefield 5	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%