UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs vs FirePro V5800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
DVI
VS

Aggregate performance score

ATI V5800
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 74 Watt
3.66

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs outperforms FirePro V5800 by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking677629
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.39no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Gen. 12 (2021)
GPU code nameJuniperTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date26 April 2010 (14 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$479 no data
Current price$354 (0.7x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80032
Core clock speed690 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors1,040 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)74 Wattno data
Texture fill rate27.60no data
Floating-point performance1,104.0 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on FirePro V5800 and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length229 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed4000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth64 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)DirectX 12_1
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCL1.2no data
VulkanN/Ano data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12−14
−33.3%
16
+33.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 11
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Battlefield 5 18
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Far Cry 5 14
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%
Hitman 3 16
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−12.5%
27−30
+12.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 13
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Battlefield 5 16
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Far Cry 5 13
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%
Hitman 3 12
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−12.5%
27−30
+12.5%
Metro Exodus 6
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4
+0%
4−5
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Battlefield 5 15
−20%
18−20
+20%
Far Cry 5 12
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Hitman 3 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how ATI V5800 and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is 33% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.66 4.40
Recency 26 April 2010 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm

The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro V5800 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro V5800 is a workstation card while UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro V5800
FirePro V5800
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 90 votes

Rate FirePro V5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 15 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.