GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Arc Graphics 140T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc Graphics 140T with GeForce GTX 660 Ti, including specs and performance data.

Arc Graphics 140T
2025
13.45
+27.9%

Arc Graphics 140T outperforms GTX 660 Ti by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking399463
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.79
Power efficiencyno data5.35
ArchitectureXe+ (2025)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameno dataGK104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)16 August 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores81344
Core clock speedno data915 MHz
Boost clock speedno data980 MHz
Number of transistorsno data3,540 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data150 Watt
Texture fill rateno data109.8
Floating-point processing powerno data2.634 TFLOPS
ROPsno data24
TMUsno data112
L1 Cacheno data112 KB
L2 Cache8 MB384 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data192-bit GDDR5
Memory clock speedno data6.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data144.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort
Multi monitor supportno data4 displays
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray-+
3D Gaming-+
3D Vision-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.3
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc Graphics 140T 13.45
+27.9%
GTX 660 Ti 10.52

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc Graphics 140T Samples: 7 5634
+27.8%
GTX 660 Ti Samples: 8178 4410

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Arc Graphics 140T 12445
+47.9%
GTX 660 Ti 8415

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Arc Graphics 140T 55018
+132%
GTX 660 Ti 23726

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc Graphics 140T 8697
+60.1%
GTX 660 Ti 5432

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Arc Graphics 140T 51104
+35.3%
GTX 660 Ti 37758

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD46
−67.4%
77
+67.4%
1440p23
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.88
1440pno data18.69

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+31%
55−60
−31%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+27.3%
21−24
−27.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+31.6%
18−20
−31.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+27.7%
45−50
−27.7%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+31%
55−60
−31%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+27.3%
21−24
−27.3%
Far Cry 5 48
+37.1%
35−40
−37.1%
Fortnite 75−80
+21.9%
60−65
−21.9%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+23.9%
45−50
−23.9%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+30.3%
30−35
−30.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+31.6%
18−20
−31.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+31.6%
35−40
−31.6%
Valorant 110−120
+17.2%
95−100
−17.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+27.7%
45−50
−27.7%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+31%
55−60
−31%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
−2.1%
192
+2.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+27.3%
21−24
−27.3%
Far Cry 5 45
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%
Fortnite 75−80
+21.9%
60−65
−21.9%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+23.9%
45−50
−23.9%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+30.3%
30−35
−30.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 29
−37.9%
40−45
+37.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+31.6%
18−20
−31.6%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+27.3%
21−24
−27.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+31.6%
35−40
−31.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 57
+104%
27−30
−104%
Valorant 110−120
+17.2%
95−100
−17.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+27.7%
45−50
−27.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+27.3%
21−24
−27.3%
Far Cry 5 40
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+23.9%
45−50
−23.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+31.6%
18−20
−31.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+31.6%
35−40
−31.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31
+10.7%
27−30
−10.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+21.9%
60−65
−21.9%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+30%
20−22
−30%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
+25.9%
80−85
−25.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Valorant 140−150
+21.4%
110−120
−21.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+35.7%
27−30
−35.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+30.4%
21−24
−30.4%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+32%
24−27
−32%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+36.4%
10−12
−36.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+33.3%
14−16
−33.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−33
+30.4%
21−24
−30.4%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+18.2%
21−24
−18.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+38.5%
12−14
−38.5%
Valorant 75−80
+31.6%
55−60
−31.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+36.4%
10−12
−36.4%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%

Full HD
High Preset

Dota 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how Arc Graphics 140T and GTX 660 Ti compete in popular games:

  • GTX 660 Ti is 67% faster in 1080p
  • Arc Graphics 140T is 44% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc Graphics 140T is 104% faster.
  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 660 Ti is 38% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc Graphics 140T performs better in 58 tests (88%)
  • GTX 660 Ti performs better in 2 tests (3%)
  • there's a draw in 6 tests (9%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.45 10.52
Recency 6 January 2025 16 August 2012

Arc Graphics 140T has a 27.9% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 12 years.

The Arc Graphics 140T is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 660 Ti in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc Graphics 140T is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 660 Ti is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc Graphics 140T
Arc Graphics 140T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
GeForce GTX 660 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 14 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 140T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 871 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc Graphics 140T or GeForce GTX 660 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.