Quadro P4000 Mobile vs Radeon RX 8060S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 8060S with Quadro P4000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RX 8060S
2025
40.04
+116%

RX 8060S outperforms P4000 Mobile by a whopping 116% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking114316
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.16
Power efficiencyno data14.15
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameno dataGP104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)11 January 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$819.61

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores401792
Core clock speedno data1227 MHz
Boost clock speed2900 MHz1228 MHz
Number of transistorsno data7,200 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data100 Watt
Texture fill rateno data137.4
Floating-point processing powerno data4.398 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data112
L1 Cacheno data672 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Interfaceno dataMXM-B (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1502 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
Display Portno data1.4

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
3D Stereono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.5
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 8060S 40.04
+116%
P4000 Mobile 18.56

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 8060S 40164
+160%
P4000 Mobile 15433

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 8060S 96996
+168%
P4000 Mobile 36260

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 8060S 26826
+119%
P4000 Mobile 12259

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 8060S 148182
+175%
P4000 Mobile 53834

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD103
+129%
45−50
−129%
1440p51
+143%
21−24
−143%
4K35
+119%
16−18
−119%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data18.21
1440pno data39.03
4Kno data51.23

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+122%
100−105
−122%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+138%
40−45
−138%
Hogwarts Legacy 95−100
+140%
40−45
−140%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+127%
60−65
−127%
Counter-Strike 2 215
+126%
95−100
−126%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+138%
40−45
−138%
Far Cry 5 96
+140%
40−45
−140%
Fortnite 170−180
+118%
80−85
−118%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+123%
70−75
−123%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+131%
55−60
−131%
Hogwarts Legacy 95−100
+140%
40−45
−140%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+124%
70−75
−124%
Valorant 230−240
+133%
100−105
−133%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+127%
60−65
−127%
Counter-Strike 2 109
+118%
50−55
−118%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+132%
120−130
−132%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+138%
40−45
−138%
Far Cry 5 95
+138%
40−45
−138%
Fortnite 170−180
+118%
80−85
−118%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+123%
70−75
−123%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+131%
55−60
−131%
Grand Theft Auto V 127
+131%
55−60
−131%
Hogwarts Legacy 95−100
+140%
40−45
−140%
Metro Exodus 95−100
+143%
40−45
−143%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+124%
70−75
−124%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150
+125%
65−70
−125%
Valorant 230−240
+133%
100−105
−133%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+127%
60−65
−127%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+138%
40−45
−138%
Far Cry 5 92
+130%
40−45
−130%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+123%
70−75
−123%
Hogwarts Legacy 95−100
+140%
40−45
−140%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+124%
70−75
−124%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 101
+124%
45−50
−124%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 170−180
+118%
80−85
−118%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 71
+137%
30−33
−137%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 280−290
+117%
130−140
−117%
Grand Theft Auto V 70
+133%
30−33
−133%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+122%
27−30
−122%
Valorant 260−270
+120%
120−130
−120%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+127%
45−50
−127%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+129%
21−24
−129%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+120%
45−50
−120%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+134%
50−55
−134%
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50
+129%
21−24
−129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+123%
35−40
−123%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
+116%
50−55
−116%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 36
+125%
16−18
−125%
Grand Theft Auto V 76
+117%
35−40
−117%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+117%
12−14
−117%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+131%
16−18
−131%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+117%
30−33
−117%
Valorant 240−250
+124%
110−120
−124%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+117%
30−33
−117%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+125%
24−27
−125%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+123%
35−40
−123%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+117%
12−14
−117%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+133%
24−27
−133%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
+125%
24−27
−125%

This is how RX 8060S and P4000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RX 8060S is 129% faster in 1080p
  • RX 8060S is 143% faster in 1440p
  • RX 8060S is 119% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 40.04 18.56
Recency 6 January 2025 11 January 2017

RX 8060S has a 115.7% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 7 years.

The Radeon RX 8060S is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P4000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 8060S is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P4000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 8060S
Radeon RX 8060S
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Mobile
Quadro P4000 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon RX 8060S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 30 votes

Rate Quadro P4000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 8060S or Quadro P4000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.