Arc B580 vs Arc A770M

Place in the ranking	183	100
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	93.08
Power efficiency	17.72	14.69
Architecture	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)	Xe2 (2025)
GPU code name	DG2-512	BMG-G21
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	2022 (3 years ago)	16 January 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4096	2560
Core clock speed	1650 MHz	2670 MHz
Boost clock speed	2050 MHz	2670 MHz
Number of transistors	21,700 million	19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	190 Watt
Texture fill rate	524.8	427.2
Floating-point processing power	16.79 TFLOPS	13.67 TFLOPS
ROPs	128	80
TMUs	256	160
Tensor Cores	512	160
Ray Tracing Cores	32	20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	272 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	2375 MHz
Memory bandwidth	512.0 GB/s	456.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A770M 30.93

Arc B580 40.60
+31.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A770M 11888

Arc B580 15607
+31.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	94 −33%	125 +33%
1440p	57 −21.1%	69 +21.1%
4K	39 −10.3%	43 +10.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	1.99
1440p	no data	3.61
4K	no data	5.79

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	60−65 −138%	143 +138%
Cyberpunk 2077	113 −23.9%	140−150 +23.9%
Elden Ring	62 −29%	80−85 +29%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 −17.8%	100−110 +17.8%
Counter-Strike 2	79 −48.1%	117 +48.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	48 −25%	60−65 +25%
Forza Horizon 4	256 −17.2%	300−310 +17.2%
Metro Exodus	100 +3.1%	95−100 −3.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 −23.4%	75−80 +23.4%
Valorant	120−130 −32.5%	160−170 +32.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 −17.8%	100−110 +17.8%
Counter-Strike 2	60−65 −73.3%	104 +73.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	39 −28.2%	50−55 +28.2%
Dota 2	58 −141%	140 +141%
Elden Ring	100−110 −37.5%	140−150 +37.5%
Far Cry 5	56 −23.2%	69 +23.2%
Fortnite	140−150 −20.5%	170−180 +20.5%
Forza Horizon 4	211 −28%	270−280 +28%
Grand Theft Auto V	86 −27.9%	110−120 +27.9%
Metro Exodus	82 +128%	36 −128%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 −13.4%	200−210 +13.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 −23.4%	75−80 +23.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−110 −39.4%	140−150 +39.4%
Valorant	120−130 −32.5%	160−170 +32.5%
World of Tanks	270−280 −1.5%	270−280 +1.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 −17.8%	100−110 +17.8%
Counter-Strike 2	65 −46.2%	95 +46.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	33 −21.2%	40−45 +21.2%
Dota 2	100−110 −27.5%	130−140 +27.5%
Far Cry 5	85−90 −15.1%	95−100 +15.1%
Forza Horizon 4	179 −28.5%	230−240 +28.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 −13.4%	200−210 +13.4%
Valorant	120−130 −32.5%	160−170 +32.5%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	50−55 −27.8%	69 +27.8%
Elden Ring	55−60 −44.8%	80−85 +44.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	55−60 −27.3%	70−75 +27.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 −25.7%	220−230 +25.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 −41.4%	40−45 +41.4%
World of Tanks	200−210 −29%	250−260 +29%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 −21.3%	70−75 +21.3%
Counter-Strike 2	43 −41.9%	61 +41.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	22 −22.7%	27−30 +22.7%
Far Cry 5	95−100 −37.5%	130−140 +37.5%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 −29.4%	110−120 +29.4%
Metro Exodus	65−70 −26.1%	85−90 +26.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 −22.4%	60−65 +22.4%
Valorant	85−90 −46.1%	130−140 +46.1%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−33 −40%	40−45 +40%
Dota 2	45 −73.3%	78 +73.3%
Elden Ring	27−30 −48.1%	40−45 +48.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	45 −22.2%	55−60 +22.2%
Metro Exodus	37 −24.3%	46 +24.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	95−100 −36.1%	130−140 +36.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 −35%	27−30 +35%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45 −22.2%	55−60 +22.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −41.2%	45−50 +41.2%
Counter-Strike 2	30−33 −40%	40−45 +40%
Cyberpunk 2077	11 −27.3%	14−16 +27.3%
Dota 2	55−60 −25%	70−75 +25%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −41.9%	60−65 +41.9%
Fortnite	40−45 −41.5%	55−60 +41.5%
Forza Horizon 4	74 −28.4%	95−100 +28.4%
Valorant	45−50 −53.3%	65−70 +53.3%

This is how Arc A770M and Arc B580 compete in popular games:

Arc B580 is 33% faster in 1080p
Arc B580 is 21% faster in 1440p
Arc B580 is 10% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A770M is 128% faster.
in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc B580 is 141% faster.

All in all, in popular games: