RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs Arc A750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Arc A750
2022
8 GB GDDR6, 225 Watt
43.80

RTX 2000 Ada Generation outperforms Arc A750 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking7365
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation21.65no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022)Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameDG2-512AD107
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date12 October 2022 (1 year ago)12 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$289 $649
Current price$625 (2.2x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35842816
Core clock speed2050 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2400 MHz2130 MHz
Number of transistors21,700 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate537.6187.4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed16000 MHz16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.04x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDAno data8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A750 43.80
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 45.22
+3.2%

RTX 2000 Ada Generation outperforms Arc A750 by 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Arc A750 11952
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 17474
+46.2%

RTX 2000 Ada Generation outperforms Arc A750 by 46% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD102
+2%
100−110
−2%
1440p61
+1.7%
60−65
−1.7%
4K37
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 62
+3.3%
60−65
−3.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90
+0%
90−95
+0%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95−100
−3.1%
100−105
+3.1%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+6%
100−105
−6%
Forza Horizon 4 112
+1.8%
110−120
−1.8%
Hitman 3 100−110
−0.9%
110−120
+0.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 195
−2.6%
200−210
+2.6%
Metro Exodus 144
+2.9%
140−150
−2.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+2%
100−105
−2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 285
−1.8%
290−300
+1.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 96
+1.1%
95−100
−1.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55
+0%
55−60
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 76
+1.3%
75−80
−1.3%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95−100
−3.1%
100−105
+3.1%
Far Cry 5 68
−2.9%
70−75
+2.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 55
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 106
+6%
100−105
−6%
Hitman 3 100−110
−0.9%
110−120
+0.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 162
+1.3%
160−170
−1.3%
Metro Exodus 110
+0%
110−120
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+2%
100−105
−2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 174
+2.4%
170−180
−2.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 185
−2.7%
190−200
+2.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 89
−1.1%
90−95
+1.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45
+0%
45−50
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 69
−1.4%
70−75
+1.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95−100
−3.1%
100−105
+3.1%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90
+0%
90−95
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 113
+2.7%
110−120
−2.7%
Metro Exodus 99
−1%
100−105
+1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 69
−1.4%
70−75
+1.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 63
−3.2%
65−70
+3.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+2%
100−105
−2%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+1.2%
85−90
−1.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 128
−1.6%
130−140
+1.6%
Hitman 3 55−60
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 38
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 54
−1.9%
55−60
+1.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
−2.9%
70−75
+2.9%
Far Cry 5 76
+1.3%
75−80
−1.3%
Forza Horizon 4 79
−1.3%
80−85
+1.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 92
+2.2%
90−95
−2.2%
Metro Exodus 86
+1.2%
85−90
−1.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 145
+3.6%
140−150
−3.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 57
+3.6%
55−60
−3.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 57
+3.6%
55−60
−3.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 80
+0%
80−85
+0%
Hitman 3 35−40
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+3.6%
55−60
−3.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 44
−2.3%
45−50
+2.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 69
−1.4%
70−75
+1.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 28
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30
+0%
30−33
+0%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−1.9%
55−60
+1.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
Forza Horizon 4 61
+1.7%
60−65
−1.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 58
+5.5%
55−60
−5.5%
Metro Exodus 52
+4%
50−55
−4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30
+0%
30−33
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how Arc A750 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • Arc A750 is 2% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A750 is 2% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A750 is 6% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 43.80 45.22
Recency 12 October 2022 12 February 2024
Cost $289 $649
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 70 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Arc A750 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A750
Arc A750
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 685 votes

Rate Arc A750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 8 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.