Tesla T4G vs Arc A730M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking244not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.92no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameDG2-512TU104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date2022 (3 years ago)13 September 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30722560
Core clock speed1100 MHz585 MHz
Boost clock speed2050 MHz1590 MHz
Number of transistors21,700 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate393.6254.4
Floating-point processing power12.6 TFLOPS8.141 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs192160
Tensor Cores384320
Ray Tracing Cores2440

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB16 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/s320.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-7.5
DLSS++

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 70 Watt

Arc A730M has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Tesla T4G, on the other hand, has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 14.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Arc A730M and Tesla T4G. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Arc A730M is a notebook card while Tesla T4G is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A730M
Arc A730M
NVIDIA Tesla T4G
Tesla T4G

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 113 votes

Rate Arc A730M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate Tesla T4G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc A730M or Tesla T4G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.