GeForce GTX 1630 vs Arc A370M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A370M with GeForce GTX 1630, including specs and performance data.

Arc A370M
2022
4 GB GDDR6, 35 Watt
13.14
+2.3%

Arc A370M outperforms GTX 1630 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking388393
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency26.1811.94
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameDG2-128TU117
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 March 2022 (2 years ago)28 June 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024512
Core clock speed300 MHz1740 MHz
Boost clock speed1550 MHz1785 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate99.2057.12
Floating-point processing power3.174 TFLOPS1.828 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs6432
Ray Tracing Cores8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A370M 13.14
+2.3%
GTX 1630 12.84

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A370M 5115
+2.4%
GTX 1630 4997

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD38
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
1440p21
+16.7%
18−21
−16.7%
4K40
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
+15%
40−45
−15%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Forza Horizon 4 74
+5.7%
70−75
−5.7%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%
Valorant 50−55
+6%
50−55
−6%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Dota 2 42
+5%
40−45
−5%
Far Cry 5 24
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Fortnite 75−80
+7.1%
70−75
−7.1%
Forza Horizon 4 62
+3.3%
60−65
−3.3%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 29
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Metro Exodus 13
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+3.2%
95−100
−3.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%
Valorant 50−55
+6%
50−55
−6%
World of Tanks 170−180
+4.7%
170−180
−4.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+10%
10−11
−10%
Dota 2 66
+10%
60−65
−10%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+11.1%
45−50
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 53
+6%
50−55
−6%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+3.2%
95−100
−3.2%
Valorant 50−55
+6%
50−55
−6%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 11
+10%
10−11
−10%
Grand Theft Auto V 11
+10%
10−11
−10%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+9%
100−105
−9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
World of Tanks 90−95
+4.4%
90−95
−4.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Forza Horizon 4 37
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Valorant 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Dota 2 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Dota 2 40
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Fortnite 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Valorant 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%

This is how Arc A370M and GTX 1630 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A370M is 9% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A370M is 17% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A370M is 14% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.14 12.84
Recency 30 March 2022 28 June 2022
Chip lithography 6 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 75 Watt

Arc A370M has a 2.3% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 114.3% lower power consumption.

GTX 1630, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Arc A370M and GeForce GTX 1630.

Be aware that Arc A370M is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 1630 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A370M
Arc A370M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
GeForce GTX 1630

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 167 votes

Rate Arc A370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 1299 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.