HD Graphics 400 vs Arc A350M

Place in performance ranking	342	1041
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Xe HPG (2020−2022)	Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code name	Alchemist	Braswell GT1
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	30 March 2022 (2 years ago)	1 April 2015 (9 years ago)
Current price	no data	$710

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	6	96
Core clock speed	1150 MHz	320 MHz
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz	640 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt (25 - 35 Watt TGP)	6 Watt
Texture fill rate	55.20	7.680
Floating-point performance	no data	134.4 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Arc A350M and HD Graphics 400 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x1
Width	no data	IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	DDR3L
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	6.6	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.3
OpenCL	3.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.1.80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A350M 14.32
+1167%

HD Graphics 400 1.13

Arc A350M outperforms HD Graphics 400 by 1167% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Arc A350M 7147
+1488%

HD Graphics 400 450

Arc A350M outperforms HD Graphics 400 by 1488% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	36 +1700%	2−3 −1700%
1440p	18 +1700%	1−2 −1700%
4K	8	0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

27
+1250%

2−3

−1250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +1350%	2−3 −1350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35 +1650%	2−3 −1650%
Battlefield 5	45−50 +1433%	3−4 −1433%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +1350%	2−3 −1350%
Cyberpunk 2077	19 +1800%	1−2 −1800%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +1550%	2−3 −1550%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +1200%	3−4 −1200%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +1260%	5−6 −1260%
Hitman 3	27−30 +1300%	2−3 −1300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +1350%	4−5 −1350%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +1467%	3−4 −1467%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +1233%	3−4 −1233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	66 +1220%	5−6 −1220%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +1467%	3−4 −1467%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +1350%	2−3 −1350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	20 +1900%	1−2 −1900%
Battlefield 5	45−50 +1433%	3−4 −1433%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +1350%	2−3 −1350%
Cyberpunk 2077	16 +1500%	1−2 −1500%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +1550%	2−3 −1550%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +1200%	3−4 −1200%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +1260%	5−6 −1260%
Hitman 3	27−30 +1300%	2−3 −1300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +1350%	4−5 −1350%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +1467%	3−4 −1467%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +1233%	3−4 −1233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	53 +1225%	4−5 −1225%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	43 +1333%	3−4 −1333%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +1467%	3−4 −1467%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +1350%	2−3 −1350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16 +1500%	1−2 −1500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +1350%	2−3 −1350%
Cyberpunk 2077	12	0−1
Far Cry 5	30−35 +1550%	2−3 −1550%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +1260%	5−6 −1260%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +1350%	4−5 −1350%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45 +1400%	3−4 −1400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	19 +1800%	1−2 −1800%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +1467%	3−4 −1467%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45
+1233%

3−4

−1233%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +1300%	2−3 −1300%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +1200%	2−3 −1200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +1300%	1−2 −1300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14 +1300%	1−2 −1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +1600%	1−2 −1600%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8	0−1
Far Cry 5	25 +2400%	1−2 −2400%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +1250%	2−3 −1250%
Hitman 3	16−18 +1600%	1−2 −1600%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +1350%	2−3 −1350%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +2400%	1−2 −2400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	37 +1750%	2−3 −1750%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +1400%	1−2 −1400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10	0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24
+2200%

1−2

−2200%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 +1300%	1−2 −1300%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12	0−1
Hitman 3	10−11	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +1400%	1−2 −1400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	15 +1400%	1−2 −1400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3	0−1
Far Cry 5	8−9	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +1800%	1−2 −1800%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +1400%	1−2 −1400%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +1300%	1−2 −1300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14
+1200%

1−2

−1200%

This is how Arc A350M and HD Graphics 400 compete in popular games:

Arc A350M is 1700% faster in 1080p
Arc A350M is 1700% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	14.32	1.13
Recency	30 March 2022	1 April 2015
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	6 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	6 Watt