Arc Graphics 130V vs Arc A350M

Place in the ranking	361	410
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	40.17	no data
Architecture	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)	Xe² (2025)
GPU code name	DG2-128	Lunar Lake iGPU
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	30 March 2022 (2 years ago)	no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	7
Core clock speed	300 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz	1850 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	55.20	no data
Floating-point processing power	1.766 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	24	no data
TMUs	48	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	6	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12_2
Shader Model	6.6	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	3.0	no data
Vulkan	1.3	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A350M 14.56
+23.3%

Arc Graphics 130V 11.81

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Arc A350M 10730
+12.7%

Arc Graphics 130V 9523

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc A350M 7147

Arc Graphics 130V 8255
+15.5%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Arc A350M 3050

Arc Graphics 130V 3242
+6.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	35 +9.4%	32 −9.4%
1440p	16 +33.3%	12−14 −33.3%
4K	9 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	24−27 −64%	41 +64%
Cyberpunk 2077	27 +28.6%	21−24 −28.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +20.5%	35−40 −20.5%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 −24%	31 +24%
Cyberpunk 2077	9 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%
Forza Horizon 4	66 −7.6%	71 +7.6%
Forza Horizon 5	32 +3.2%	30−35 −3.2%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +25%	30−35 −25%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +20%	30−33 −20%
Valorant	56 +19.1%	45−50 −19.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +20.5%	35−40 −20.5%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 −12%	28 +12%
Cyberpunk 2077	8 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Dota 2	38 −7.9%	41 +7.9%
Far Cry 5	27 −3.7%	28 +3.7%
Fortnite	80−85 +19.1%	65−70 −19.1%
Forza Horizon 4	53 −9.4%	58 +9.4%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 +22.6%	30−35 −22.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	26 −61.5%	40−45 +61.5%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +25%	30−35 −25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 +18%	85−90 −18%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +20%	30−33 −20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +22.2%	35−40 −22.2%
Valorant	55−60 +25.5%	45−50 −25.5%
World of Tanks	190−200 +15.9%	160−170 −15.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +20.5%	35−40 −20.5%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +0%	25 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	6 +50%	4−5 −50%
Dota 2	59 +31.1%	45−50 −31.1%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +17.4%	45−50 −17.4%
Forza Horizon 4	45 −6.7%	48 +6.7%
Forza Horizon 5	21 −47.6%	30−35 +47.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 +18%	85−90 −18%
Valorant	55−60 +25.5%	45−50 −25.5%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	10 −60%	16−18 +60%
Grand Theft Auto V	10 −70%	16−18 +70%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 +26%	100−105 −26%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +30%	10−11 −30%
World of Tanks	100−110 +21.4%	80−85 −21.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +26.1%	21−24 −26.1%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +37.5%	8−9 −37.5%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +29.6%	27−30 −29.6%
Forza Horizon 4	37 +32.1%	27−30 −32.1%
Forza Horizon 5	21−24 +27.8%	18−20 −27.8%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +33.3%	24−27 −33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +18.8%	16−18 −18.8%
Valorant	35−40 +24.1%	27−30 −24.1%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Dota 2	11 −100%	21−24 +100%
Grand Theft Auto V	11 −100%	21−24 +100%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 +22.9%	35−40 −22.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	11 −100%	21−24 +100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 +27.3%	10−12 −27.3%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Dota 2	24−27 +23.8%	21−24 −23.8%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +20%	14−16 −20%
Fortnite	16−18 +23.1%	12−14 −23.1%
Forza Horizon 4	19 +18.8%	16−18 −18.8%
Forza Horizon 5	10−12 +22.2%	9−10 −22.2%
Valorant	16−18 +33.3%	12−14 −33.3%

This is how Arc A350M and Arc Graphics 130V compete in popular games:

Arc A350M is 9% faster in 1080p
Arc A350M is 33% faster in 1440p
Arc A350M is 29% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A350M is 43% faster.
in Dota 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Arc Graphics 130V is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games: