Radeon RX 7700 vs Arc A310

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A310 and Radeon RX 7700, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc A310
2022
4 GB GDDR6, 75 Watt
14.23

RX 7700 outperforms Arc A310 by a whopping 311% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking36640
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.0920.18
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameDG2-128Navi 32
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date12 October 2022 (2 years ago)2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$479

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7683072
Core clock speed2000 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speed2000 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate64.00499.2
Floating-point processing power3.072 TFLOPS31.95 TFLOPS
ROPs1696
TMUs32192
Tensor Cores96no data
Ray Tracing Cores648

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1937 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth124.0 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A310 14.23
RX 7700 58.49
+311%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A310 5472
RX 7700 22490
+311%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD37
−305%
150−160
+305%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.19

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 32
−306%
130−140
+306%
Elden Ring 40−45
−295%
170−180
+295%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−291%
180−190
+291%
Counter-Strike 2 26
−285%
100−105
+285%
Forza Horizon 4 80
−275%
300−310
+275%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−310%
160−170
+310%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−300%
140−150
+300%
Valorant 55−60
−304%
230−240
+304%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−291%
180−190
+291%
Counter-Strike 2 26
−285%
100−105
+285%
Dota 2 28
−293%
110−120
+293%
Elden Ring 40−45
−295%
170−180
+295%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−296%
210−220
+296%
Fortnite 80−85
−275%
300−310
+275%
Forza Horizon 4 65
−300%
260−270
+300%
Grand Theft Auto V 28
−293%
110−120
+293%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−310%
160−170
+310%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
−288%
400−450
+288%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−300%
140−150
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−295%
170−180
+295%
Valorant 55−60
−304%
230−240
+304%
World of Tanks 180−190
−301%
750−800
+301%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−291%
180−190
+291%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−300%
100−105
+300%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−296%
210−220
+296%
Forza Horizon 4 54
−307%
220−230
+307%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
−288%
400−450
+288%
Valorant 55−60
−304%
230−240
+304%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 20−22
−300%
80−85
+300%
Elden Ring 21−24
−309%
90−95
+309%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−305%
85−90
+305%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
−275%
450−500
+275%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−275%
45−50
+275%
World of Tanks 100−105
−300%
400−450
+300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−279%
110−120
+279%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−285%
50−55
+285%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−282%
130−140
+282%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−282%
130−140
+282%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−287%
120−130
+287%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−289%
70−75
+289%
Valorant 35−40
−300%
140−150
+300%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Dota 2 24−27
−300%
100−105
+300%
Elden Ring 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−300%
100−105
+300%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−305%
170−180
+305%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−300%
100−105
+300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−285%
50−55
+285%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−289%
70−75
+289%
Fortnite 16−18
−306%
65−70
+306%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−300%
80−85
+300%
Valorant 14−16
−300%
60−65
+300%

This is how Arc A310 and RX 7700 compete in popular games:

  • RX 7700 is 305% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.23 58.49
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 200 Watt

Arc A310 has 166.7% lower power consumption.

RX 7700, on the other hand, has a 311% higher aggregate performance score, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A310 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A310
Arc A310
AMD Radeon RX 7700
Radeon RX 7700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 259 votes

Rate Arc A310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 20 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.