Radeon R9 M395X vs Arc 8-Cores iGPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc 8-Cores iGPU and Radeon R9 M395X, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc 8-Cores iGPU
2023
17.53
+30.1%

Arc 8-Cores iGPU outperforms R9 M395X by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking308381
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe LPG (2023)GCN 3 (2014−2016)
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPUAmethyst XT
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)16 October 2014 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores82048
Boost clock speed2300 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data92.54
Floating-point performanceno data2.961 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
Eyefinity-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
HD3D-+
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
TrueAudio-+
ZeroCore-+
Switchable graphics-+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_2DirectX® 12
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno dataNot Listed
Mantle-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc 8-Cores iGPU 17.53
+30.1%
R9 M395X 13.47

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc 8-Cores iGPU 8679
+9.6%
R9 M395X 7921

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40
+33.3%
30−35
−33.3%
1440p16
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+32.3%
30−35
−32.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+37.2%
40−45
−37.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+37%
27−30
−37%
Far Cry 5 37
+19.4%
30−35
−19.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+32.4%
35−40
−32.4%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+29.5%
85−90
−29.5%
Hitman 3 35−40
+40%
24−27
−40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 33
−112%
70−75
+112%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+32.4%
35−40
−32.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+34.1%
40−45
−34.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+17.6%
70−75
−17.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+32.3%
30−35
−32.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+37.2%
40−45
−37.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+37%
27−30
−37%
Far Cry 5 35
+12.9%
30−35
−12.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+32.4%
35−40
−32.4%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+29.5%
85−90
−29.5%
Hitman 3 35−40
+40%
24−27
−40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27
−159%
70−75
+159%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+37.8%
45−50
−37.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+32.4%
35−40
−32.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+34.1%
40−45
−34.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43
+30.3%
30−35
−30.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+17.6%
70−75
−17.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+32.3%
30−35
−32.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+31.1%
45−50
−31.1%
Far Cry 5 33
+6.5%
30−35
−6.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+40%
35−40
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+29.5%
85−90
−29.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 23
−43.5%
30−35
+43.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+17.6%
70−75
−17.6%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Hitman 3 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+37%
27−30
−37%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+38.5%
12−14
−38.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+45.6%
65−70
−45.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+29.8%
80−85
−29.8%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Hitman 3 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+43.1%
65−70
−43.1%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+46.2%
12−14
−46.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hitman 3 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Hitman 3 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how Arc 8-Cores iGPU and R9 M395X compete in popular games:

  • Arc 8-Cores iGPU is 33% faster in 1080p
  • Arc 8-Cores iGPU is 33% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc 8-Cores iGPU is 60% faster.
  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R9 M395X is 159% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc 8-Cores iGPU is ahead in 44 tests (61%)
  • R9 M395X is ahead in 3 tests (4%)
  • there's a draw in 25 tests (35%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.53 13.47
Recency 14 December 2023 16 October 2014
Chip lithography 5 nm 28 nm

Arc 8-Cores iGPU has a 30.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc 8-Cores iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M395X in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU
Arc 8-Cores iGPU
AMD Radeon R9 M395X
Radeon R9 M395X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 59 votes

Rate Arc 8-Cores iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 15 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M395X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.