Radeon R9 M395X vs Arc 7-Core iGPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc 7-Core iGPU and Radeon R9 M395X, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.


Arc 7-Core iGPU
2023
15.65
+28.1%

7-Core iGPU outperforms R9 M395X by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking378446
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data12.55
ArchitectureXe LPG (2023−2025)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPUAmethyst
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date14 December 2023 (2 years ago)5 May 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores72048
Core clock speedno data723 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data92.54
Floating-point processing powerno data2.961 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data128
L1 Cache1.3 MB512 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
Eyefinity-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
HD3D-+
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
TrueAudio-+
ZeroCore-+
Switchable graphics-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_2DirectX® 12
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno dataNot Listed
Mantle-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Arc 7-Core iGPU 15.65
+28.1%
R9 M395X 12.22

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc 7-Core iGPU 7613
R9 M395X 7921
+4.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 90
+32.4%
65−70
−32.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+23.1%
24−27
−23.1%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 36
+44%
24−27
−44%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 65−70
+25.9%
50−55
−25.9%
Counter-Strike 2 58
−17.2%
65−70
+17.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 27
+3.8%
24−27
−3.8%
Far Cry 5 39
−2.6%
40−45
+2.6%
Fortnite 85−90
+22.2%
70−75
−22.2%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+24.5%
50−55
−24.5%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+31.6%
35−40
−31.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+31.1%
45−50
−31.1%
Valorant 120−130
+17.4%
100−110
−17.4%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 65−70
+25.9%
50−55
−25.9%
Counter-Strike 2 31
−119%
65−70
+119%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
+18.3%
170−180
−18.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
−13%
24−27
+13%
Far Cry 5 36
−11.1%
40−45
+11.1%
Fortnite 85−90
+22.2%
70−75
−22.2%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+24.5%
50−55
−24.5%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+31.6%
35−40
−31.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 24
−95.8%
45−50
+95.8%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+36%
24−27
−36%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+31.1%
45−50
−31.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+59.4%
30−35
−59.4%
Valorant 120−130
+17.4%
100−110
−17.4%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+25.9%
50−55
−25.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
−18.2%
24−27
+18.2%
Far Cry 5 35
−14.3%
40−45
+14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+24.5%
50−55
−24.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+31.1%
45−50
−31.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 23
−39.1%
30−35
+39.1%
Valorant 120−130
+17.4%
100−110
−17.4%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 85−90
+22.2%
70−75
−22.2%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+25.8%
90−95
−25.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+36.8%
18−20
−36.8%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+33.3%
14−16
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+58.2%
95−100
−58.2%
Valorant 150−160
+20.5%
130−140
−20.5%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
+32.4%
30−35
−32.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+30%
30−33
−30%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Valorant 85−90
+32.8%
65−70
−32.8%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+35.3%
16−18
−35.3%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+30.8%
12−14
−30.8%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%

Full HD
High

Dota 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Dota 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

This is how Arc 7-Core iGPU and R9 M395X compete in popular games:

  • Arc 7-Core iGPU is 30% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Arc 7-Core iGPU is 63% faster.
  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R9 M395X is 119% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc 7-Core iGPU performs better in 48 tests (80%)
  • R9 M395X performs better in 9 tests (15%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.65 12.22
Recency 14 December 2023 5 May 2015
Chip lithography 5 nm 28 nm

Arc 7-Core iGPU has a 28% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc 7-Core iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M395X in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 41 votes

Rate Arc 7-Core iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 18 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M395X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Arc 7-Core iGPU or Radeon R9 M395X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.