Quadro P4000 Mobile vs Apple M1 8-Core GPU

Place in performance ranking	347	237
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	6.20
Architecture	no data	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	no data	N17E-Q3
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	10 November 2020 (3 years ago)	11 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$819.61
Current price	no data	$1053 (1.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	8	1792
Core clock speed	1278 MHz	1202 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1228 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	5 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	100 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	137.4
Floating-point performance	no data	4,398 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Apple M1 8-Core GPU and Quadro P4000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	no data	MXM-B (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	no data	8 GB
Memory bus width	no data	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	6006 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	192 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	No outputs
Display Port	no data	1.4

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	no data	+
3D Stereo	no data	+
Mosaic	no data	+
nView Display Management	no data	+
Optimus	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	no data	12
Shader Model	no data	5.1
OpenGL	no data	4.5
OpenCL	no data	1.2
Vulkan	no data	1.2.131
CUDA	no data	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU 14.08

P4000 Mobile 21.47
+52.5%

Quadro P4000 Mobile outperforms Apple M1 8-Core GPU by 52% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

Apple M1 8-Core GPU 280200

P4000 Mobile 369407
+31.8%

Quadro P4000 Mobile outperforms Apple M1 8-Core GPU by 32% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−34.6%

35−40
+34.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16

−57.1%

21−24
+57.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −61.1%	27−30 +61.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −64.3%	21−24 +64.3%
Battlefield 5	30−33 −53.3%	45−50 +53.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −55.6%	27−30 +55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −57.1%	21−24 +57.1%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −57.1%	30−35 +57.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −62.5%	35−40 +62.5%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −67.5%	65−70 +67.5%
Hitman 3	16−18 −68.8%	27−30 +68.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −62.9%	55−60 +62.9%
Metro Exodus	30−33 −56.7%	45−50 +56.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −62.5%	35−40 +62.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −63%	40−45 +63%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −53.3%	45−50 +53.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −61.1%	27−30 +61.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −64.3%	21−24 +64.3%
Battlefield 5	30−33 −53.3%	45−50 +53.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −55.6%	27−30 +55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −57.1%	21−24 +57.1%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −57.1%	30−35 +57.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −62.5%	35−40 +62.5%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −67.5%	65−70 +67.5%
Hitman 3	16−18 −68.8%	27−30 +68.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −62.9%	55−60 +62.9%
Metro Exodus	30−33 −56.7%	45−50 +56.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −62.5%	35−40 +62.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −63%	40−45 +63%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −66.7%	30−33 +66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −53.3%	45−50 +53.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −61.1%	27−30 +61.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −64.3%	21−24 +64.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −55.6%	27−30 +55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −57.1%	21−24 +57.1%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −57.1%	30−35 +57.1%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −67.5%	65−70 +67.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −62.9%	55−60 +62.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −63%	40−45 +63%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −66.7%	30−33 +66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −53.3%	45−50 +53.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27

−62.5%

35−40
+62.5%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −68.8%	27−30 +68.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 −62.5%	24−27 +62.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 −57.1%	10−12 +57.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −70%	16−18 +70%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −64.3%	21−24 +64.3%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −68.8%	27−30 +68.8%
Hitman 3	10−11 −70%	16−18 +70%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −61.1%	27−30 +61.1%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −71.4%	24−27 +71.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −56.3%	24−27 +56.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −66.7%	14−16 +66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−64.3%

21−24
+64.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Hitman 3	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 −66.7%	14−16 +66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −62.5%	12−14 +62.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −58.3%	18−20 +58.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 −66.7%	14−16 +66.7%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −62.5%	12−14 +62.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%