Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs Titan X Pascal

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GT 1030 GTX 1050 GTX 1050 Ti GTX 1060 6 GB GTX 1070 GTX 1070 Ti GTX 1080 GTX 1080 Ti TITAN Xp Titan X Pascal TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
7400 7600 7600 XT 7650 GRE 7700 XT 7800 XT 7900 GRE 7900 XT 7900 XTX Steam Machine GPU

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Titan X Pascal and Radeon RX 7650 GRE, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Titan X Pascal
2016, $1,199
12 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
31.13
RX 7650 GRE
2025, $279
8 GB GDDR6, 165 Watt
42.77
+37.4%

7650 GRE outperforms Titan X Pascal by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Titan X Pascal Titan X Pascal
RX 7650 GRE RX 7650 GRE

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking205103
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.1392.97
Power efficiency9.6920.18
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameGP102Navi 33
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 August 2016 (10 years ago)February 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 $279

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX 7650 GRE has 1417% better value for money than Titan X Pascal.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35842048
Core clock speed1417 MHz1720 MHz
Boost clock speed1531 MHz2695 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt165 Watt
Texture fill rate342.9345.0
Floating-point processing power10.97 TFLOPS22.08 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs224128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L0 Cacheno data512 KB
L1 Cache1.3 MB512 KB
L2 Cache3 MB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mm204 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB8 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1251 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth480.4 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI++
G-SYNC support+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Titan X Pascal 31.13
RX 7650 GRE 42.77
+37.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Titan X Pascal 13026
RX 7650 GRE 17894
+37.4%
Samples: 30

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD124170−180
+37.1%
1440p74
−26%
100−110
4K5875−80
+29.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p9.671.64
+83%
1440p16.202.79
+82.8%
4K20.673.72
+82%
  • RX 7650 GRE has 83% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 7650 GRE has 83% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 7650 GRE has 82% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 173 230−240
+32.9%
Counter-Strike 2 337 450−500
+33.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 83 110−120
+32.5%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 126 170−180
+34.9%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 127 170−180
+33.9%
Battlefield 5 153 210−220
+37.3%
Counter-Strike 2 291 350−400
+20.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 74 100−105
+35.1%
Far Cry 5 162 220−230
+35.8%
Fortnite 210 280−290
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 127 170−180
+33.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 113 150−160
+32.7%
Valorant 296 400−450
+35.1%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 78 100−105
+28.2%
Battlefield 5 147 200−210
+36.1%
Counter-Strike 2 205 280−290
+36.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 350−400
+26.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 65 85−90
+30.8%
Dota 2 252 300−310
+19%
Far Cry 5 149 200−210
+34.2%
Fortnite 199 270−280
+35.7%
Forza Horizon 4 121 160−170
+32.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 160 210−220
+31.3%
Metro Exodus 96 130−140
+35.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 113 150−160
+32.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 184 250−260
+35.9%
Valorant 275 350−400
+27.3%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 137 180−190
+31.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 57 75−80
+31.6%
Dota 2 232 300−310
+29.3%
Far Cry 5 140 190−200
+35.7%
Forza Horizon 4 112 150−160
+33.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 102 140−150
+37.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95 130−140
+36.8%
Valorant 181 240−250
+32.6%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 170 230−240
+35.3%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 111 150−160
+35.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230 300−310
+35.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 103 140−150
+35.9%
Metro Exodus 58 75−80
+29.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 240−250
+37.1%
Valorant 258 350−400
+35.7%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 85−90 110−120
+29.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 37 50−55
+35.1%
Far Cry 5 101 130−140
+28.7%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90 110−120
+27.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60 75−80
+33.9%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 80−85 110−120
+35.8%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 24−27 30−33
+20%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40 45−50
+28.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 99 130−140
+31.3%
Metro Exodus 36 45−50
+25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 68 90−95
+32.4%
Valorant 257 350−400
+36.2%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 71 95−100
+33.8%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40 45−50
+28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 17 21−24
+23.5%
Dota 2 160 210−220
+31.3%
Far Cry 5 53 70−75
+32.1%
Forza Horizon 4 73 100−105
+37%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 44 60−65
+36.4%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 60 80−85
+33.3%

This is how Titan X Pascal and RX 7650 GRE compete in popular games:

  • RX 7650 GRE is 37% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7650 GRE is 35% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7650 GRE is 29% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 31.13 42.77
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 165 Watt

Titan X Pascal has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 7650 GRE, on the other hand, has a 37% higher aggregate performance score, a 63% more advanced lithography process, and 34% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 7650 GRE is our recommended choice as it beats the Titan X Pascal in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Titan X Pascal Titan X Pascal
vs
RX Vega 56 Radeon RX Vega 56
RX 7650 GRE Radeon RX 7650 GRE
vs
RTX 2070 Super GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Titan X Pascal Titan X Pascal
vs
Arc A770 Arc A770
HD Graphics 4600 HD Graphics 4600
vs
K2100M Quadro K2100M
RTX 4050 Mobile GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
vs
GT 635M GeForce GT 635M
HD Graphics 4400 HD Graphics 4400
vs
GT 540M GeForce GT 540M
ATI X1300 Radeon X1300
vs
HD Graphics 4600 HD Graphics 4600
R4 (Beema) Radeon R4 (Beema)
vs
HD Graphics 4000 HD Graphics 4000
HD Graphics 630 HD Graphics 630
vs
GTX 1080 GeForce GTX 1080
R7 240 Radeon R7 240
vs
GTX 1070 GeForce GTX 1070
UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630
vs
GTX 780 Ti GeForce GTX 780 Ti
UHD Graphics 605 UHD Graphics 605
vs
GTX 970 GeForce GTX 970
GeForce MX230 GeForce MX230
vs
GTX 970 GeForce GTX 970

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.6 3014 votes

Rate Titan X Pascal on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 121 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7650 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Titan X Pascal or Radeon RX 7650 GRE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.