Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) vs 8065S

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
820M 840M 860M 880M 890M 8065S RX 8040S RX 8060S
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) RX 6550M RX 6700S RX 6800S Steam Deck 8CU

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon 8065S and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Radeon 8065S
2026
55 Watt
46.41
+1040%

8065S outperforms Graphics (Ryzen 7000) by a whopping 1040% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Radeon 8065S Radeon 8065S
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking85751
Place by popularitynot in top-10080
Power efficiency65.79no data
ArchitectureRDNA 3.5 (2025−2026)RDNA 2 (2021−2025)
GPU code nameGorgon HaloRaphael
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date28 September 2026 (less than a year ago)26 September 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560128
Core clock speed1295 MHzno data
Boost clock speed3000 MHz2200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology4 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Wattno data
Texture fill rate480.0no data
ROPs64no data
TMUs160no data
Ray Tracing Cores40no data
L0 Cache1.3 MBno data
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data
L3 Cache32 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.4-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD210−220
+1005%
19

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 250−260
+1376%
16−18
Cyberpunk 2077 110−120
+1313%
8−9
Hogwarts Legacy 110−120
+1178%
9−10
Resident Evil 4 Remake 130−140
+2117%
6−7

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 140−150
+825%
16−18
Counter-Strike 2 250−260
+1376%
16−18
Cyberpunk 2077 110−120
+1313%
8−9
Far Cry 5 140−150
+1133%
12−14
Fortnite 200−210
+742%
24−27
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+805%
20−22
Hogwarts Legacy 110−120
+1178%
9−10
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+900%
16−18
Valorant 270−280
+393%
55−60

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 140−150
+825%
16−18
Counter-Strike 2 250−260
+1376%
16−18
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+281%
70−75
Cyberpunk 2077 110−120
+1313%
8−9
Far Cry 5 140−150
+1133%
12−14
Fortnite 200−210
+742%
24−27
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+805%
20−22
Grand Theft Auto V 140−150
+1023%
12−14
Hogwarts Legacy 110−120
+1178%
9−10
Metro Exodus 110−120
+1557%
7−8
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+900%
16−18
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 180−190
+1417%
12−14
Valorant 270−280
+393%
55−60

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 140−150
+825%
16−18
Cyberpunk 2077 110−120
+1313%
8−9
Far Cry 5 140−150
+1133%
12−14
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+805%
20−22
Hogwarts Legacy 110−120
+1178%
9−10
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+900%
16−18
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 180−190
+1417%
12−14

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 200−210
+742%
24−27

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+1500%
8−9
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350
+984%
30−35
Grand Theft Auto V 100−105
+3233%
3−4
Metro Exodus 70−75
+3500%
2−3
Valorant 300−350
+654%
40−45

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 110−120
+11500%
1−2
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+1867%
3−4
Far Cry 5 110−120
+1571%
7−8
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+1320%
10−11
Hogwarts Legacy 55−60
+1350%
4−5
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95−100
+1860%
5−6

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 120−130
+1513%
8−9

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+1060%
5−6
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120
+588%
16−18
Metro Exodus 45−50
+1400%
3−4
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+1043%
7−8
Valorant 280−290
+1478%
18−20

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75−80 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+2600%
1−2
Far Cry 5 65−70
+2133%
3−4
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+1840%
5−6
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+1450%
2−3
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+1725%
4−5

4K
Epic

Fortnite 65−70
+1550%
4−5

Full HD
High

Dota 2 41 41

Full HD
Ultra

Dota 2 37 37
Valorant 55−60 55−60

1440p
High

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35 30−35

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 12−14 12−14

This is how Radeon 8065S and Graphics (Ryzen 7000) compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 8065S is 1005% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 8065S is 11500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 8065S performs better in 53 tests (91%)
  • there's a draw in 5 tests (9%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 46.41 4.07
Recency 28 September 2026 26 September 2022
Chip lithography 4 nm 6 nm

Radeon 8065S has a 1040% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 33% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 8065S is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Radeon 8065S Radeon 8065S
vs
RTX 4070 Mobile GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
vs
GTX 670M GeForce GTX 670M
Radeon 8065S Radeon 8065S
vs
RTX 5070 Mobile GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile
RX 6650 XT RX 6650 XT
vs
Apple M5 Max 32-Core GPU M5 Max 32-Core GPU
Arc Pro B370 Arc Pro B370
vs
Arc B370 Arc B370
FirePro D700 D700
vs
Apple M4 9-Core GPU M4 9 Core GPU
UHD Graphics 605 UHD Graphics 605
vs
Radeon 8065S 8065S
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
vs
Radeon 8065S 8065S
RTX 4070 Mobile 4070 Mobile
vs
GTX 1070 SLI Mobile 1070 SLI Mobile
Radeon 890M 890M
vs
GTX 1070 SLI Mobile GTX 1070 SLI Mobile
9800M GTS 9800M GTS
vs
GTX 980 SLI Mobile GTX 980 SLI Mobile
GT 630 GT 630
vs
GTX 980 SLI Mobile GTX 980 SLI Mobile
GTX 285 285
vs
GTX 980 SLI Mobile 980 SLI Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 8065S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 400 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon 8065S or Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.