Opteron 4386 vs Xeon X5698
Aggregate performance score
Xeon X5698 outperforms Opteron 4386 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon X5698 and Opteron 4386 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1857 | 1904 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 1.58 | 2.05 |
| Architecture codename | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) | Seoul (2012) |
| Release date | 14 February 2011 (13 years ago) | 4 December 2012 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon X5698 and Opteron 4386 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 8192 KB |
| L3 cache | 12288 KB (shared) | 8192 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 239 mm2 | 315 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 1,170 million | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon X5698 and Opteron 4386 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 2 |
| Socket | 1366 | C32 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5698 and Opteron 4386. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon X5698 and Opteron 4386 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5698 and Opteron 4386 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5698 and Opteron 4386. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5698 and Opteron 4386.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.17 | 2.06 |
| Recency | 14 February 2011 | 4 December 2012 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 95 Watt |
Xeon X5698 has a 5.3% higher aggregate performance score.
Opteron 4386, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 36.8% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon X5698 and Opteron 4386.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5698 and Opteron 4386, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
