Opteron 3380 vs Xeon Bronze 3104

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Bronze 3104
2017
6 cores / 6 threads, 85 Watt
2.79
+7.3%
Opteron 3380
2012
8 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
2.60

Xeon Bronze 3104 outperforms Opteron 3380 by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Bronze 3104 and Opteron 3380 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16771718
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.10no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Bronzeno data
Power efficiency3.113.79
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Delhi (2012−2013)
Release date11 July 2017 (7 years ago)4 December 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$213no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Bronze 3104 and Opteron 3380 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads68
Base clock speed1.7 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz3.6 GHz
Multiplier17no data
L1 cache384 KB384 KB
L2 cache6 MB8192 KB
L3 cache8.25 MB8192 KB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data315 mm2
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Bronze 3104 and Opteron 3380 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Bronze 3104 and Opteron 3380. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon Bronze 3104 and Opteron 3380 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Bronze 3104 and Opteron 3380 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Bronze 3104 and Opteron 3380. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2133DDR3
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth102.403 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Bronze 3104 and Opteron 3380.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Bronze 3104 2.79
+7.3%
Opteron 3380 2.60

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Bronze 3104 4437
+7.3%
Opteron 3380 4134

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.79 2.60
Recency 11 July 2017 4 December 2012
Physical cores 6 8
Threads 6 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon Bronze 3104 has a 7.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Opteron 3380, on the other hand, has 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and 30.8% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon Bronze 3104 and Opteron 3380.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Bronze 3104 and Opteron 3380, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Bronze 3104
Xeon Bronze 3104
AMD Opteron  3380
Opteron 3380

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 15 votes

Rate Xeon Bronze 3104 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 5 votes

Rate Opteron 3380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Bronze 3104 or Opteron 3380, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.