Atom x5-E3930 vs Xeon W3680

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W3680
2010
6 cores / 12 threads, 130 Watt
4.53
+655%

Xeon W3680 outperforms Atom x5-E3930 by a whopping 655% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W3680 and Atom x5-E3930 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking12512693
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.45no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno data5x Intel Atom
Architecture codenameGulftown (2010−2011)Apollo Lake (2016)
Release date16 March 2010 (14 years ago)30 August 2014 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$350no data
Current price$213 (0.6x MSRP)$965

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W3680 and Atom x5-E3930 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed3.33 GHz1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz1.8 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)56K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB (shared)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size239 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature68 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data103 °C
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W3680 and Atom x5-E3930 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1366Intel BGA 1296
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt7 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3680 and Atom x5-E3930. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon W3680 and Atom x5-E3930 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3680 and Atom x5-E3930 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3680 and Atom x5-E3930. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1866
Maximum memory size24 GB8 GB
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 500

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3680 and Atom x5-E3930.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W3680 4.53
+655%
Atom x5-E3930 0.60

Xeon W3680 outperforms Atom x5-E3930 by 655% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon W3680 7007
+655%
Atom x5-E3930 928

Xeon W3680 outperforms Atom x5-E3930 by 655% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.53 0.60
Recency 16 March 2010 30 August 2014
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 7 Watt

The Xeon W3680 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x5-E3930 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W3680 is a server/workstation processor while Atom x5-E3930 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3680 and Atom x5-E3930, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W3680
Xeon W3680
Intel Atom x5-E3930
Atom x5-E3930

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 138 votes

Rate Xeon W3680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom x5-E3930 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W3680 or Atom x5-E3930, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.