EPYC 7H12 vs Xeon L5506

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon L5506
2009
4 cores / 4 threads
2.40
EPYC 7H12
2019
64 cores / 128 threads
45.03
+1776%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Xeon L5506 by 1776% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Xeon L5506 and EPYC 7H12 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking166539
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money24.9622.31
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameGainestown (2009−2010)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release dateMarch 2009 (15 years ago)18 September 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$125no data
Current price$131 (1x MSRP)$1970

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon L5506 has 12% better value for money than EPYC 7H12.

Technical specs

Xeon L5506 and EPYC 7H12 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads4128
Base clock speed2.13 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.13 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size263 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
Number of transistors731 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon L5506 and EPYC 7H12 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1366TR4
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5506 and EPYC 7H12. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon L5506 and EPYC 7H12 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5506 and EPYC 7H12 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5506 and EPYC 7H12. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size144 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels38
Maximum memory bandwidth19.2 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon L5506 2.40
EPYC 7H12 45.03
+1776%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Xeon L5506 by 1776% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon L5506 3706
EPYC 7H12 69633
+1779%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Xeon L5506 by 1779% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 2.40 45.03
Physical cores 4 64
Threads 4 128
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 280 Watt

The EPYC 7H12 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon L5506 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon L5506 and EPYC 7H12, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon L5506
Xeon L5506
AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 2 votes

Rate Xeon L5506 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 450 votes

Rate EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon L5506 or EPYC 7H12, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.