EPYC 9654 vs Xeon E7-4830

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon E7-4830
2011
8 cores / 16 threads
12.92
EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads
78.94
+511%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Xeon E7-4830 by 511% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Xeon E7-4830 and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking5314
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation32.7210.10
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E7AMD EPYC
Architecture codenameWestmere (2010−2011)Genoa
Release date5 April 2011 (13 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,059$11,805
Current price$136 (0.1x MSRP)$4544 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E7-4830 has 224% better value for money than EPYC 9654.

Detailed Specifications

Xeon E7-4830 and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)96
Threads16192
Base clock speed2.13 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus support6.4 GT/sno data
L1 cache512 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size513 mm212x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature64 °Cno data
Number of transistors2600 Million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E7-4830 and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration42
SocketLGA1567SP5
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E7-4830 and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E7-4830 and EPYC 9654 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E7-4830 and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E7-4830 and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-978, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, Speed-1066DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size2 TB6 TiB
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.113 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E7-4830 and EPYC 9654.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E7-4830 12.92
EPYC 9654 78.94
+511%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Xeon E7-4830 by 511% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E7-4830 19981
EPYC 9654 122091
+511%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Xeon E7-4830 by 511% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 12.92 78.94
Recency 5 April 2011 10 November 2022
Physical cores 8 96
Threads 16 192
Cost $2059 $11805
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 360 Watt

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E7-4830 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E7-4830 and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E7-4830
Xeon E7-4830
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Xeon E7-4830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 979 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E7-4830 or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.