Xeon E7-4830 vs E5-2699 v3

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon E5-2699 v3
2014
18 cores / 36 threads
12.92
+1.6%
Xeon E7-4830
2011
8 cores / 16 threads
12.72

E5-2699 v3 outperforms E7-4830 by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Xeon E7-4830 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking521531
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation17.2032.59
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon E7
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014)Westmere (2010−2011)
Release date8 September 2014 (9 years ago)5 April 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,059
Current price$266 $136 (0.1x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E7-4830 has 89% better value for money than Xeon E5-2699 v3.

Detailed Specifications

Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Xeon E7-4830 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3616
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.13 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus supportno data6.4 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)512 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB
L3 cache45 MB (shared)24 MB
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size356 mm2513 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °C64 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)77 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,600 million2600 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Xeon E7-4830 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration24
SocketFCLGA2011LGA1567
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Xeon E7-4830. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Xeon E7-4830 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Xeon E7-4830 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Xeon E7-4830. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR3-800, DDR3-978, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, Speed-1066
Maximum memory size768 GB2 TB
Max memory channels44
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/s34.113 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Xeon E7-4830.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2699 v3 12.92
+1.6%
Xeon E7-4830 12.72

E5-2699 v3 outperforms E7-4830 by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon E5-2699 v3 20295
+1.6%
Xeon E7-4830 19981

E5-2699 v3 outperforms E7-4830 by 2% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 12.92 12.72
Recency 8 September 2014 5 April 2011
Physical cores 18 8
Threads 36 16
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 105 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Xeon E7-4830.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2699 v3 and Xeon E7-4830, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3
Xeon E5-2699 v3
Intel Xeon E7-4830
Xeon E7-4830

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 738 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2699 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon E7-4830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2699 v3 or Xeon E7-4830, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.