Celeron M 390 vs Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Celeron M 390 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 220 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Celeron M |
| Architecture codename | Strix Point (2024) | Dothan (2004−2005) |
| Release date | July 2024 (recently) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Celeron M 390 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 400 MHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 24 MB (shared) | 1 MB L2 KB |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.004V-1.292V |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Celeron M 390 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FP8 | PPGA478, H-PBGA479 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 21 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Celeron M 390. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
| Status | no data | Discontinued |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Celeron M 390 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Celeron M 390 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Celeron M 390. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 890M | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Celeron M 390.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 12 | 1 |
| Threads | 24 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 21 Watt |
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 has 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 2150% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron M 390, on the other hand, has 33.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Celeron M 390. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Celeron M 390, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
