EPYC 9184X vs EPYC 4484PX
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 4484PX outperforms EPYC 9184X by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 208 | 231 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 50.98 | 4.66 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 10.15 | 3.62 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Raphael (2023−2025) | Genoa-X (2023) |
| Release date | 21 May 2024 (2 years ago) | 13 June 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | $4,928 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
EPYC 4484PX has 994% better value for money than EPYC 9184X.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of EPYC 4484PX and EPYC 9184X: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 3.55 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.6 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 128 MB (shared) | 768 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 2x 71 mm2 | 8x 72 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 47 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 17,840 million | 90,160 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 4484PX and EPYC 9184X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | AM5 | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 320 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 4484PX and EPYC 9184X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 4484PX and EPYC 9184X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 4484PX and EPYC 9184X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Graphics | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 4484PX and EPYC 9184X.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 28 | 128 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 28.88 | 27.46 |
| Recency | 21 May 2024 | 13 June 2023 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 16 |
| Threads | 24 | 32 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 320 Watt |
EPYC 4484PX has a 5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, and 167% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9184X, on the other hand, has 33% more physical cores and 33% more threads.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between AMD EPYC 4484PX and AMD EPYC 9184X.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
