Core 2 Extreme QX6700 vs Ryzen 3 2200G

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Ryzen 3 2200G
2018
4 cores / 4 threads
4.34
+219%
Core 2 Extreme QX6700
4 cores / 4 threads
1.36

Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms Core 2 Extreme QX6700 by 219% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Ryzen 3 2200G and Core 2 Extreme QX6700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking12552111
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money9.942.94
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3Core 2 Extreme (Desktop)
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2018)Kentsfield (2007)
Release date12 February 2018 (6 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$99no data
Current price$117 (1.2x MSRP)$312

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 3 2200G has 238% better value for money than Core 2 Extreme QX6700.

Technical specs

Ryzen 3 2200G and Core 2 Extreme QX6700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz2.67 GHz
Bus supportno data1066 MHz
L1 cache128K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache4 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Die size210 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,950 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 2200G and Core 2 Extreme QX6700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketAM4no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 2200G and Core 2 Extreme QX6700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 2200G and Core 2 Extreme QX6700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 2200G and Core 2 Extreme QX6700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelno data
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 2200G and Core 2 Extreme QX6700.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes12no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 2200G 4.34
+219%
Core 2 Extreme QX6700 1.36

Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms Core 2 Extreme QX6700 by 219% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 3 2200G 6767
+219%
Core 2 Extreme QX6700 2118

Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms Core 2 Extreme QX6700 by 219% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 3 2200G 4625
+69.7%
Core 2 Extreme QX6700 2725

Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms Core 2 Extreme QX6700 by 70% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 3 2200G 16684
+75.3%
Core 2 Extreme QX6700 9520

Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms Core 2 Extreme QX6700 by 75% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 3 2200G 6636
+65%
Core 2 Extreme QX6700 4022

Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms Core 2 Extreme QX6700 by 65% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 3 2200G 7
+121%
Core 2 Extreme QX6700 3

Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms Core 2 Extreme QX6700 by 121% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 4.34 1.36
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 130 Watt

The Ryzen 3 2200G is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Extreme QX6700 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 2200G and Core 2 Extreme QX6700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Ryzen 3 2200G
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700
Core 2 Extreme QX6700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2059 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 2200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 44 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX6700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 2200G or Core 2 Extreme QX6700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.