Core 2 Extreme QX6700 vs Ryzen 5 1600X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 1600X
2017
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
8.22
+518%
Core 2 Extreme QX6700
2006
4 cores / 4 threads, 130 Watt
1.33

Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms Core 2 Extreme QX6700 by a whopping 518% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 1600X and Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9252260
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.50no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5Core 2 Extreme (Desktop)
Power efficiency8.190.97
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Kentsfield (2007)
Release date11 April 2017 (7 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$249no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 1600X and Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads124
Base clock speed3.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4 GHz2.67 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s1066 MHz
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)8 MB (shared)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Die size192 mm22x 143 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data64 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million582 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 1600X and Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4775
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes24no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 1600X 8.22
+518%
Core 2 Extreme QX6700 1.33

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 1600X 13057
+516%
Core 2 Extreme QX6700 2118

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.22 1.33
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 130 Watt

Ryzen 5 1600X has a 518% higher aggregate performance score, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 36.8% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 1600X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Extreme QX6700 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 1600X and Core 2 Extreme QX6700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Ryzen 5 1600X
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700
Core 2 Extreme QX6700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 922 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 1600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 46 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX6700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 1600X or Core 2 Extreme QX6700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.