Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs Core 2 Extreme QX6700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Extreme QX6700
2006
4 cores / 4 threads, 130 Watt
1.33
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
2018
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.20
+216%

Ryzen Embedded V1605B outperforms Core 2 Extreme QX6700 by a whopping 216% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22601388
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesCore 2 Extreme (Desktop)AMD Ryzen Embedded
Power efficiency0.9726.50
Architecture codenameKentsfield (2007)Zen (2017−2020)
Release dateno data21 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.67 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
Multiplierno data20
L1 cache64K (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache8 MB (shared)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Die size2x 143 mm2210 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)64 °Cno data
Number of transistors582 million4,950 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
Socket775FP5
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1100 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Extreme QX6700 1.33
Ryzen Embedded V1605B 4.20
+216%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Extreme QX6700 2118
Ryzen Embedded V1605B 6677
+215%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.33 4.20
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen Embedded V1605B has a 215.8% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 766.7% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Embedded V1605B is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Extreme QX6700 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700
Core 2 Extreme QX6700
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Ryzen Embedded V1605B

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 46 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX6700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 21 vote

Rate Ryzen Embedded V1605B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme QX6700 or Ryzen Embedded V1605B, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.