Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs Core 2 Extreme QX6700
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Embedded V1605B outperforms Core 2 Extreme QX6700 by a whopping 215% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2144 | 1292 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.94 | 1.97 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) | AMD Ryzen Embedded |
| Architecture codename | Kentsfield (2007) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | no data | 21 February 2018 (6 years ago) |
| Current price | $312 | $525 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Core 2 Extreme QX6700 has 49% better value for money than Ryzen Embedded V1605B.
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.67 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Bus support | 1066 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 128K (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 2 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 210 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4,950 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | no data | FP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 32 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 38.397 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | no data | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Ryzen Embedded V1605B outperforms Core 2 Extreme QX6700 by 215% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Ryzen Embedded V1605B outperforms Core 2 Extreme QX6700 by 215% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.37 | 4.32 |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 15 Watt |
The Ryzen Embedded V1605B is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Extreme QX6700 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and Ryzen Embedded V1605B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
